<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Economics Losing Its Spine?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2006/04/29/is-economics-losing-its-spine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2006/04/29/is-economics-losing-its-spine/</link>
	<description>Economics of organizations, strategy, entrepreneurship, innovation, and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 19:17:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: genericface blog &#187; Economics: Puzzles or Problems? A Reply.</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2006/04/29/is-economics-losing-its-spine/#comment-513</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[genericface blog &#187; Economics: Puzzles or Problems? A Reply.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 18:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://organizationsandmarkets.wordpress.com/2006/04/29/is-economics-losing-its-spine/#comment-513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Is this a bad thing? On the one hand, it must be admitted that prior attempts to tackle the &#8220;big questions&#8221; were not entirely successful. (Consider the Keynesian macro models of the 1960s and 1970s — Resquiat in Pacem!) On the other hand, as contemporary microeconomic theory has become more flexible and realistic, better able to explain a variety of empirical phenomena, it has arguably become too elastic, and may even be &#8220;losing its spine,&#8221; as Nicolai has argued. (The Folk Theorem doesn&#8217;t quite say that &#8220;anything goes,&#8221; but it comes awfully close.) Bright young scholars such as Steve Levitt, Austan Goolsbee, Matt Rabin, and Tyler Cowen do a terrific job illuminating various facets of everyday life, but their interests seem far removed from those that occupied earlier generations of economists. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is this a bad thing? On the one hand, it must be admitted that prior attempts to tackle the &#8220;big questions&#8221; were not entirely successful. (Consider the Keynesian macro models of the 1960s and 1970s — Resquiat in Pacem!) On the other hand, as contemporary microeconomic theory has become more flexible and realistic, better able to explain a variety of empirical phenomena, it has arguably become too elastic, and may even be &#8220;losing its spine,&#8221; as Nicolai has argued. (The Folk Theorem doesn&#8217;t quite say that &#8220;anything goes,&#8221; but it comes awfully close.) Bright young scholars such as Steve Levitt, Austan Goolsbee, Matt Rabin, and Tyler Cowen do a terrific job illuminating various facets of everyday life, but their interests seem far removed from those that occupied earlier generations of economists. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Organizations and Markets &#187; Should the Term &#8220;Neoclassical&#8221; Die?</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2006/04/29/is-economics-losing-its-spine/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Organizations and Markets &#187; Should the Term &#8220;Neoclassical&#8221; Die?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 06:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://organizationsandmarkets.wordpress.com/2006/04/29/is-economics-losing-its-spine/#comment-172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Economists have relaxed much of the central core, but that is different from breaking with core propositions.&#160; However, given time economists may relax so much of the core (e.g., along these lines) that something results. However, I don&#039;t believe we are there yet. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Economists have relaxed much of the central core, but that is different from breaking with core propositions.&nbsp; However, given time economists may relax so much of the core (e.g., along these lines) that something results. However, I don&#39;t believe we are there yet. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

