Who Killed the History of Economics?

26 August 2006 at 5:30 pm 1 comment

| Peter Klein |

As discussed here before, economists are not generally familiar with the history of economic thought. Roy Weintraub offers this explanation: Heterodox economists often specialize in the history of economic thought, so mainstream economists come to associate doctrinal history with heterodoxy, thus turning them off to the history of economics itself. (Thanks to Mark Thornton for the cite.)

This explanation strikes me as misguided, for two reasons. First, many heterodox economists publish in history-of-thought journals, attend history-of-thought conferences, and the like not by choice, but because they cannot get their work published in mainstream journals. The perceived link between heterodoxy and the history of economic thought is thus endogenous, begging the question of why mainstream economists are willing to tolerate heterodoxy as history but not otherwise.

Second, and more important, mainstream economists’ lack of interest in doctrinal history is more likely due to the general Whiggishness pervading modern social science. If economics is a Real Science, the argument goes, there is no need for economists to know the history of economic thought, any more than physicists need to know the history of physics. All truth in the economic theories of yesterday is already incorporated into the textbooks and the latest journal articles. In other words, the association of heterodoxy with the history of economic thought is more likely the result of economists’ lack of interest in doctrinal history, rather than the cause.

I’m curious to hear from readers in other disciplines. How do sociologists regard the history of sociological thought? What about political science, anthropology, organizational psychology, and the like?

Entry filed under: Austrian Economics, Methods/Methodology/Theory of Science. Tags: .

More Interesting Links Are Reviewers Too Powerful?

1 Comment Add your own

  • 1. brayden  |  26 August 2006 at 8:43 pm

    I think our history of sociological thought is very outdated. We know a lot about Marx, Weber, and Durkheim, but much less about the growth and history of American sociology. (Where are the great books on the rise and fall of sociology at Harvard and Columbia?) European academia has always seemed to be more diligent in recording and tracing their intellectual evolution.

    I see the problem as resulting from a lack of incentives. Most sociologists who have insider access to the discipline spend their time writing books and articles about sociological thought and doing empirical research. Introspection isn’t rewarded in the same way.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Authors

Nicolai J. Foss | home | posts
Peter G. Klein | home | posts
Richard Langlois | home | posts
Lasse B. Lien | home | posts

Guests

Former Guests | posts

Networking

Recent Posts

Categories

Feeds

Our Recent Books

Nicolai J. Foss and Peter G. Klein, Organizing Entrepreneurial Judgment: A New Approach to the Firm (Cambridge University Press, 2012).
Peter G. Klein and Micheal E. Sykuta, eds., The Elgar Companion to Transaction Cost Economics (Edward Elgar, 2010).
Peter G. Klein, The Capitalist and the Entrepreneur: Essays on Organizations and Markets (Mises Institute, 2010).
Richard N. Langlois, The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism: Schumpeter, Chandler, and the New Economy (Routledge, 2007).
Nicolai J. Foss, Strategy, Economic Organization, and the Knowledge Economy: The Coordination of Firms and Resources (Oxford University Press, 2005).
Raghu Garud, Arun Kumaraswamy, and Richard N. Langlois, eds., Managing in the Modular Age: Architectures, Networks and Organizations (Blackwell, 2003).
Nicolai J. Foss and Peter G. Klein, eds., Entrepreneurship and the Firm: Austrian Perspectives on Economic Organization (Elgar, 2002).
Nicolai J. Foss and Volker Mahnke, eds., Competence, Governance, and Entrepreneurship: Advances in Economic Strategy Research (Oxford, 2000).
Nicolai J. Foss and Paul L. Robertson, eds., Resources, Technology, and Strategy: Explorations in the Resource-based Perspective (Routledge, 2000).

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 263 other followers