<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: David Landes on Family Firms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2006/11/02/david-landes-on-family-firms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2006/11/02/david-landes-on-family-firms/</link>
	<description>Economics of organizations, strategy, entrepreneurship, innovation, and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 08:11:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: what&#8217;s so special about family firms? &#171; orgtheory.net</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2006/11/02/david-landes-on-family-firms/#comment-6151</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[what&#8217;s so special about family firms? &#171; orgtheory.net]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 15:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.wordpress.com/2006/10/30/david-landes-on-family-firms/#comment-6151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Peter Klein points to a new book by the economic historian David Landes that tracks some of the world&#8217;s most famous family businesses. This NY Times review of the book is intriguing, but it also raises what I think is an important question: what is unique about family firms? The reviewer writes that the book makes a good argument for the prominence of family firms. A third of Fortune 500 firms are still family businesses (depending, I suppose, on what you consider to be a family firm). Wal-Mart is still overseen by Sam Walton’s son. The family controls about 40 percent of the company’s stock, and a third generation is moving up through the Walton business empire. It’s a good question whether professional outsiders would have maintained, for good or for ill, the almost religious commitment to cost-cutting that the heirs seem to have inherited from the old man. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Peter Klein points to a new book by the economic historian David Landes that tracks some of the world&#8217;s most famous family businesses. This NY Times review of the book is intriguing, but it also raises what I think is an important question: what is unique about family firms? The reviewer writes that the book makes a good argument for the prominence of family firms. A third of Fortune 500 firms are still family businesses (depending, I suppose, on what you consider to be a family firm). Wal-Mart is still overseen by Sam Walton’s son. The family controls about 40 percent of the company’s stock, and a third generation is moving up through the Walton business empire. It’s a good question whether professional outsiders would have maintained, for good or for ill, the almost religious commitment to cost-cutting that the heirs seem to have inherited from the old man. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

