Archive for 4 December 2006

Levels Issues II — Do Levels Exist?

| Nicolai Foss |

As I indicated in my earlier post on levels issues in social science research, I am confused by these and I suspect that many others are also confused. Perhaps this merely reflects my lamentable lack of serious philosophical training, and it is therefore with very considerable hesitation that I venture into issues of ontology, explanation, and causation that pertain to levels of analysis. (In fact, the following to some extent has the character of a bleg).

Do levels of analysis exist? Well, obviously levels of analysis only exist in our models. Still, there may be some stuff reality that is “like” our analytical levels. If so, is there some kind of mapping from the levels of analysis of our theoretical accounts to the levels (conceivably) existing in social reality? Or, are levels (of analysis) “merely” methodological devices — features of our model — that are not necessarily mirrorred by anything in reality? (more…)

4 December 2006 at 5:05 pm 8 comments

You Know You’re Nobody If. . .

| Peter Klein |

. . . your entry gets booted off Wikipedia.

(I’m sure there is a serious lesson here about distributed knowledge, the voluntary enforcement of social norms, crowdsourcing, open-source programming, rational ignorance, or something. No time to think about it, though; gotta write my own Wikipedia entry.)

4 December 2006 at 3:05 pm Leave a comment

Management Theory and the Social Sciences

| Peter Klein |

The theme for the 2007 meeting of the European Academy of Management (Paris, 16-19 May) is “Current Management Thinking: Drawing from Social Sciences and Humanities to Address Contemporary Challenges.”

Researchers in management are invited to join us in Paris to reflect on the roots of Management, both as a scientific discipline and as a practice. In particular, Management’s focus on organisational performance is one of the critical underpinnings that transform the discipline’s borrowings from established social sciences into an autonomous field of academic investigation. This raises questions about the degree of subordination vs. emancipation of Management vis-à-vis the basic disciplines from which it draws.

Of course, the relationship between management theory and its core academic disciplines — economics, sociology, and psychology, primarily, but also history, philosophy, and political science — are key themes of this blog. 

Here is the call for papers. Submissions are due 2 January 2007.

4 December 2006 at 12:15 pm Leave a comment


Authors

Nicolai J. Foss | home | posts
Peter G. Klein | home | posts
Richard Langlois | home | posts
Lasse B. Lien | home | posts

Guests

Former Guests | posts

Networking

Recent Posts

Categories

Feeds

Our Recent Books

Nicolai J. Foss and Peter G. Klein, Organizing Entrepreneurial Judgment: A New Approach to the Firm (Cambridge University Press, 2012).
Peter G. Klein and Micheal E. Sykuta, eds., The Elgar Companion to Transaction Cost Economics (Edward Elgar, 2010).
Peter G. Klein, The Capitalist and the Entrepreneur: Essays on Organizations and Markets (Mises Institute, 2010).
Richard N. Langlois, The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism: Schumpeter, Chandler, and the New Economy (Routledge, 2007).
Nicolai J. Foss, Strategy, Economic Organization, and the Knowledge Economy: The Coordination of Firms and Resources (Oxford University Press, 2005).
Raghu Garud, Arun Kumaraswamy, and Richard N. Langlois, eds., Managing in the Modular Age: Architectures, Networks and Organizations (Blackwell, 2003).
Nicolai J. Foss and Peter G. Klein, eds., Entrepreneurship and the Firm: Austrian Perspectives on Economic Organization (Elgar, 2002).
Nicolai J. Foss and Volker Mahnke, eds., Competence, Governance, and Entrepreneurship: Advances in Economic Strategy Research (Oxford, 2000).
Nicolai J. Foss and Paul L. Robertson, eds., Resources, Technology, and Strategy: Explorations in the Resource-based Perspective (Routledge, 2000).