<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Capital and Its Structure in PDF</title>
	<atom:link href="http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/01/26/capital-and-its-structure-in-pdf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/01/26/capital-and-its-structure-in-pdf/</link>
	<description>Economics of organizations, strategy, entrepreneurship, innovation, and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 08:11:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Klein</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/01/26/capital-and-its-structure-in-pdf/#comment-12233</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Klein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 05:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/01/26/capital-and-its-structure-in-pdf/#comment-12233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, glad you&#039;re enjoying things. Peter Lewin&#039;s book &lt;em&gt;Capital in Disequilibrium &lt;/em&gt;(Routledge, 1999) develops and extends many of the themes in Lachmann&#039;s earlier book. (Peter was a student of Lachmann&#039;s, incidentally.) You can read an excerpt &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.utdallas.edu/~plewin/chapterone.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.

If you&#039;ll forgive the self-promotion, The Foss-Foss-Klein-Klein paper &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dass.missouri.edu/faculty/pklein/papers/06013.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Economic Organization of Heterogeneous Capital&quot;&lt;/a&gt; might be of interest.

Finally, Roger Garrison has several papers on recent developments in (Lachmanian) capital theory &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.auburn.edu/~garriro/articles.htm#CAPITAL-BASED MACROECONOMICS: VARIATIONS ON A&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.auburn.edu/~garriro/articles.htm#CAPITAL AND&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, glad you&#8217;re enjoying things. Peter Lewin&#8217;s book <em>Capital in Disequilibrium </em>(Routledge, 1999) develops and extends many of the themes in Lachmann&#8217;s earlier book. (Peter was a student of Lachmann&#8217;s, incidentally.) You can read an excerpt <a href="http://www.utdallas.edu/~plewin/chapterone.pdf" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ll forgive the self-promotion, The Foss-Foss-Klein-Klein paper &#8220;<a href="http://www.dass.missouri.edu/faculty/pklein/papers/06013.pdf" rel="nofollow">The Economic Organization of Heterogeneous Capital&#8221;</a> might be of interest.</p>
<p>Finally, Roger Garrison has several papers on recent developments in (Lachmanian) capital theory <a href="http://www.auburn.edu/~garriro/articles.htm#CAPITAL-BASED MACROECONOMICS: VARIATIONS ON A" rel="nofollow">here</a> and <a href="http://www.auburn.edu/~garriro/articles.htm#CAPITAL AND" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDL</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/01/26/capital-and-its-structure-in-pdf/#comment-12225</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TDL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 04:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/01/26/capital-and-its-structure-in-pdf/#comment-12225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a non-economist (or amateur, but not very good, economist) I am curious to know if the study of capital has been advanced since this writing?  I don&#039;t know if this topic is germane to your blog, but what is the body of knowledge on capital?

Regards,
TDL

P.S. Very interesting blog, I have been reading it for some time now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a non-economist (or amateur, but not very good, economist) I am curious to know if the study of capital has been advanced since this writing?  I don&#8217;t know if this topic is germane to your blog, but what is the body of knowledge on capital?</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
TDL</p>
<p>P.S. Very interesting blog, I have been reading it for some time now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Mahoney</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/01/26/capital-and-its-structure-in-pdf/#comment-12028</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe Mahoney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 17:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/01/26/capital-and-its-structure-in-pdf/#comment-12028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for this book pdf. 

A fundamental premise of the Strategic Management field is the heterogeneity of the firm.  However, to date, there is no systematic formal body of knowledge that analytically unpacks the concept of &quot;heterogeneity&quot; into essential components.

When this paper is written, I anticipate that Lachmann&#039;s concept of the &quot;heteogeneity of capital in use&quot; will play a central role.   Lachmann&#039;s work also may be connected to Penrose&#039;s resource-based approach, which emphasized heterogeneity in the SERVICES of resources and the entrepreneurial imagination to come up with new services of resources.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this book pdf. </p>
<p>A fundamental premise of the Strategic Management field is the heterogeneity of the firm.  However, to date, there is no systematic formal body of knowledge that analytically unpacks the concept of &#8220;heterogeneity&#8221; into essential components.</p>
<p>When this paper is written, I anticipate that Lachmann&#8217;s concept of the &#8220;heteogeneity of capital in use&#8221; will play a central role.   Lachmann&#8217;s work also may be connected to Penrose&#8217;s resource-based approach, which emphasized heterogeneity in the SERVICES of resources and the entrepreneurial imagination to come up with new services of resources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

