<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Religion and the Market</title>
	<atom:link href="http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/02/14/religion-and-the-market/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/02/14/religion-and-the-market/</link>
	<description>Economics of organizations, strategy, entrepreneurship, innovation, and more</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 23:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cliff Grammich</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/02/14/religion-and-the-market/#comment-12799</link>
		<dc:creator>Cliff Grammich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 00:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/02/14/religion-and-the-market/#comment-12799</guid>
		<description>One thing for which I'll credit the bishops (or their staff) is the range--one might even say the catholic (lower-case 'c') nature--of their interests.  This was brought home to me in a rather poignant way to me by a review I saw quite some time ago of an even older publication by a Church organization (apologies for the vagaries of my memory here) on black farm-land loss.  The reviewer savaged the publication, adding it was a pity that it wasn't any good, because nobody else at that time was examining the issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing for which I&#8217;ll credit the bishops (or their staff) is the range&#8211;one might even say the catholic (lower-case &#8216;c&#8217;) nature&#8211;of their interests.  This was brought home to me in a rather poignant way to me by a review I saw quite some time ago of an even older publication by a Church organization (apologies for the vagaries of my memory here) on black farm-land loss.  The reviewer savaged the publication, adding it was a pity that it wasn&#8217;t any good, because nobody else at that time was examining the issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenneth R. Gregg</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/02/14/religion-and-the-market/#comment-12789</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth R. Gregg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/02/14/religion-and-the-market/#comment-12789</guid>
		<description>Woods certainly deserves the prize.  I've read his works and I think he deserves credit for his accommplishments.  "The Church and The Market" and "The Church Confronts Modernity" are excellent additions to the modern literature on the free market and its relationship to the Catholic Church.  While, of course, there are issues which he does not address in the books, the issues that he does cover are well done.
Just a thought.
Just Ken
kgregglv@cox.net
http://classicalliberalism.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woods certainly deserves the prize.  I&#8217;ve read his works and I think he deserves credit for his accommplishments.  &#8220;The Church and The Market&#8221; and &#8220;The Church Confronts Modernity&#8221; are excellent additions to the modern literature on the free market and its relationship to the Catholic Church.  While, of course, there are issues which he does not address in the books, the issues that he does cover are well done.<br />
Just a thought.<br />
Just Ken<br />
<a href="mailto:kgregglv@cox.net">kgregglv@cox.net</a><br />
<a href="http://classicalliberalism.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://classicalliberalism.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
