Reputations Die Hard

23 February 2007 at 12:33 am 2 comments

| Peter Klein |

This debunking of Pythagoras (via Lew Rockwell) reminded me of our recent attempt at Galileo revisionism. Apparently Pythagoras was a cult leader and political activist but not a serious mathematician or philosopher. He didn’t even discover the Pythagorean Theorem!

As debunker M. F. Burnyeat observes, “beloved historical traditions die hard.”

Other debunkings that might interest our readers: Murray Rothbard on Adam Smith, Richard Rumelt on the “Honda Effect,” Ronald Coase on Fisher Body, and Phil Rosenzweig on Peters and Waterman.

Entry filed under: - Klein -, Methods/Methodology/Theory of Science. Tags: .

A Classroom Experiment in Organizational Economics The A..hole Factor in Economics

2 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Dick Langlois  |  23 February 2007 at 9:33 am

    There is, of course, a difference between debunking and reinterpretation. You can debunk only by showing that the facts are different from what was claimed — that passing ships were in fact charged for lighthouse services, or that the terms of the GM-Fisher Body contract were actually different from what Klein had claimed. In this respect it may be “debunking” — albeit well-agreed-upon debunking — to say that Adam Smith got his ideas largely from others and that he missed the Industrial Revolution (in the early 1770s!). But it is quite another thing to claim, as Rothbard does, that Smith was wrong, confused, and not the great synthesizer. The Wealth of Nations is in fact a great synthesis of Enlightenment thought, and it is brimming with fertile ideas that have stood the test of time. If you will forgive me for saying so, Peter, it has far more to tell us about the process of economic growth and industrial development than does Human Action. If we look close enough at the feet of our idols, we always discover clay caught between the toes. But that is not debunking.

  • 2. Peter G. Klein  |  23 February 2007 at 12:13 pm

    Dick, fair enough. But there are mild reintrepretations and strong reintrepretations, and the latter are awfully close to debunkings. Rothbard’s purpose, as you know, is not merely to show that Smith had feet of clay, but to argue that on the core theoretical issues of value, exchange, price, and the welfare properties of markets Smith was actually worse than his predecessors and that his influence and reputation retarded the development of “correct” economic doctrine. You may agree or disagree, but given Smith’s iconic status as the “father” of economics, the criticism hardly seems out of bounds.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Authors

Nicolai J. Foss | home | posts
Peter G. Klein | home | posts
Richard Langlois | home | posts
Lasse B. Lien | home | posts

Guests

Former Guests | posts

Networking

Recent Posts

Categories

Feeds

Our Recent Books

Nicolai J. Foss and Peter G. Klein, Organizing Entrepreneurial Judgment: A New Approach to the Firm (Cambridge University Press, 2012).
Peter G. Klein and Micheal E. Sykuta, eds., The Elgar Companion to Transaction Cost Economics (Edward Elgar, 2010).
Peter G. Klein, The Capitalist and the Entrepreneur: Essays on Organizations and Markets (Mises Institute, 2010).
Richard N. Langlois, The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism: Schumpeter, Chandler, and the New Economy (Routledge, 2007).
Nicolai J. Foss, Strategy, Economic Organization, and the Knowledge Economy: The Coordination of Firms and Resources (Oxford University Press, 2005).
Raghu Garud, Arun Kumaraswamy, and Richard N. Langlois, eds., Managing in the Modular Age: Architectures, Networks and Organizations (Blackwell, 2003).
Nicolai J. Foss and Peter G. Klein, eds., Entrepreneurship and the Firm: Austrian Perspectives on Economic Organization (Elgar, 2002).
Nicolai J. Foss and Volker Mahnke, eds., Competence, Governance, and Entrepreneurship: Advances in Economic Strategy Research (Oxford, 2000).
Nicolai J. Foss and Paul L. Robertson, eds., Resources, Technology, and Strategy: Explorations in the Resource-based Perspective (Routledge, 2000).

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 269 other followers