<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: See, We Can Study Religion Too</title>
	<atom:link href="http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/03/29/see-we-can-study-religion-too/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/03/29/see-we-can-study-religion-too/</link>
	<description>Economics of organizations, strategy, entrepreneurship, innovation, and more</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 03:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: non-overlapping magisteria, Rhetoric of &#171; Analemma</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/03/29/see-we-can-study-religion-too/#comment-14129</link>
		<dc:creator>non-overlapping magisteria, Rhetoric of &#171; Analemma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 03:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/03/29/see-we-can-study-religion-too/#comment-14129</guid>
		<description>[...] doesn&#8217;t always recognize good work when it sees it, after all. And religion is now fair game for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] doesn&#8217;t always recognize good work when it sees it, after all. And religion is now fair game for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
