<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Defending the Book</title>
	<atom:link href="http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/08/06/defending-the-book/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/08/06/defending-the-book/</link>
	<description>Economics of organizations, strategy, entrepreneurship, innovation, and more</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark E Hoffer</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/08/06/defending-the-book/#comment-44112</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark E Hoffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 03:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/08/06/defending-the-book/#comment-44112</guid>
		<description>Good Dr. Klein, 

With this: "Still, training students (and colleagues) to grapple with ideas through long, sustained arguments, rather than short bullet points, is a worthy goal for scholars in all disciplines, especially management."

You delineate the ideal of Education.  .ppt (s) only serve to draw an asymptote,  to deep into the flatline, hardly anywhere near the parabolic trajectory one finds on the way to the desir(ed/able) goal.

Alan Wall is quite correct,  the .ppt is merely an electronic extension of the command and control basis of what has passed for "Education", for far too many, for far too long.  I would imagine that they would make Dewey drool at the thought of the possibilities they possess to disable even more of our critical thinking capabilities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Dr. Klein, </p>
<p>With this: &#8220;Still, training students (and colleagues) to grapple with ideas through long, sustained arguments, rather than short bullet points, is a worthy goal for scholars in all disciplines, especially management.&#8221;</p>
<p>You delineate the ideal of Education.  .ppt (s) only serve to draw an asymptote,  to deep into the flatline, hardly anywhere near the parabolic trajectory one finds on the way to the desir(ed/able) goal.</p>
<p>Alan Wall is quite correct,  the .ppt is merely an electronic extension of the command and control basis of what has passed for &#8220;Education&#8221;, for far too many, for far too long.  I would imagine that they would make Dewey drool at the thought of the possibilities they possess to disable even more of our critical thinking capabilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2007-08-07 at Jacob Christensen</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/08/06/defending-the-book/#comment-43565</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2007-08-07 at Jacob Christensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 12:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/08/06/defending-the-book/#comment-43565</guid>
		<description>[...] Organisations and Markets: Defending the book Books teach more than videos, PowerPoint presentations, and similar substitutes, writes Alan Wall (via Mark Brady) (tags: academic education teaching technology books) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Organisations and Markets: Defending the book Books teach more than videos, PowerPoint presentations, and similar substitutes, writes Alan Wall (via Mark Brady) (tags: academic education teaching technology books) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonfernquest</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/08/06/defending-the-book/#comment-43477</link>
		<dc:creator>jonfernquest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 03:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/08/06/defending-the-book/#comment-43477</guid>
		<description>Powerpoint, article, book all seem to be complements, with articles ideally rolling up to books, with articles being reduceable to powerpoint (essentially just a serialised outline). In fact, the thought experiment "what kind of powerpoint would I make this article into" is a good revising technique and way to bring focus to any article. IMHO ideally **the** book should be the final long-worked on definitive statement, worthy of being placed on a library shelf (and not gathering dust) perhaps even published posthumously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Powerpoint, article, book all seem to be complements, with articles ideally rolling up to books, with articles being reduceable to powerpoint (essentially just a serialised outline). In fact, the thought experiment &#8220;what kind of powerpoint would I make this article into&#8221; is a good revising technique and way to bring focus to any article. IMHO ideally **the** book should be the final long-worked on definitive statement, worthy of being placed on a library shelf (and not gathering dust) perhaps even published posthumously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spostrel</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/08/06/defending-the-book/#comment-43311</link>
		<dc:creator>spostrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 17:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/08/06/defending-the-book/#comment-43311</guid>
		<description>The proposed contrast between books and Power Point seems artificial to me. I can't see how the two actually compete, especially in a lit class. Power Point is mostly a substitute for transparencies and whiteboards. What lit student doesn't have a copy of the book at hand during lecture?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The proposed contrast between books and Power Point seems artificial to me. I can&#8217;t see how the two actually compete, especially in a lit class. Power Point is mostly a substitute for transparencies and whiteboards. What lit student doesn&#8217;t have a copy of the book at hand during lecture?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
