<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on the Noble Prize (or the Economics Prize in Memory of Nobel)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/10/18/more-on-the-noble-prize/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/10/18/more-on-the-noble-prize/</link>
	<description>Economics of organizations, strategy, entrepreneurship, innovation, and more</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 05:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: dhoopes</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/10/18/more-on-the-noble-prize/#comment-55598</link>
		<dc:creator>dhoopes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/10/18/more-on-the-noble-prize/#comment-55598</guid>
		<description>I don't know about economics, but in strategy evolutionary economics has had a profound and very positive influence.  However, there are many contributions made by Nelson and Winter that are not recognized or acknowledged.  

I think many (most) who write about capabilities have no idea how important Nelson and Winter (1982) is to that theory.

I am hoping to change this a bit with a paper or two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about economics, but in strategy evolutionary economics has had a profound and very positive influence.  However, there are many contributions made by Nelson and Winter that are not recognized or acknowledged.  </p>
<p>I think many (most) who write about capabilities have no idea how important Nelson and Winter (1982) is to that theory.</p>
<p>I am hoping to change this a bit with a paper or two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kari</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/10/18/more-on-the-noble-prize/#comment-55569</link>
		<dc:creator>Kari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 11:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/10/18/more-on-the-noble-prize/#comment-55569</guid>
		<description>I light of the post above, I would be very interested in hearing what the authors of this blog think the chances are that (anyone in) evolutionary economics will get a Nobel prize . . . ever.  Is evolutionary economics becoming more influential or is that just wishful thinking on my part?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I light of the post above, I would be very interested in hearing what the authors of this blog think the chances are that (anyone in) evolutionary economics will get a Nobel prize . . . ever.  Is evolutionary economics becoming more influential or is that just wishful thinking on my part?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
