<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Pet Peeve</title>
	<atom:link href="http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/12/28/my-pet-peeve/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/12/28/my-pet-peeve/</link>
	<description>Economics of organizations, strategy, entrepreneurship, innovation, and more</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 05:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve Phelan</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/12/28/my-pet-peeve/#comment-66734</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Phelan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 20:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/12/28/my-pet-peeve/#comment-66734</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Warren!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Warren!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warren Miller</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/12/28/my-pet-peeve/#comment-66723</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 18:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/12/28/my-pet-peeve/#comment-66723</guid>
		<description>A nit, Steve: the correct phrase is "systematic risk," not "systemic risk."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A nit, Steve: the correct phrase is &#8220;systematic risk,&#8221; not &#8220;systemic risk.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom S.</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/12/28/my-pet-peeve/#comment-66669</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 06:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/12/28/my-pet-peeve/#comment-66669</guid>
		<description>I doubt DeLong is picking on industry men. Read through to the link DeLong provided in your quote. In the end he uses a quote by Warren Buffett who is picking on academics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt DeLong is picking on industry men. Read through to the link DeLong provided in your quote. In the end he uses a quote by Warren Buffett who is picking on academics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Phelan</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/12/28/my-pet-peeve/#comment-66661</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Phelan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 05:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/12/28/my-pet-peeve/#comment-66661</guid>
		<description>Does it make it more plausible? ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does it make it more plausible? ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael webster</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/12/28/my-pet-peeve/#comment-66660</link>
		<dc:creator>michael webster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 05:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/12/28/my-pet-peeve/#comment-66660</guid>
		<description>The exact quote used by De Long was: " By contrast, portfolio diversification did not work for bonds, which were all "subject to the same hazards" which were "not reduced by increasing the number of different bonds held."

CDO's were said to be different because according to Felix Salmon, the overcollateralization afforded by the aggregation of sub prime mortgages meant at least some tranches could be A rated.

Edgar Smith wasn't talking about this type of diversification at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The exact quote used by De Long was: &#8221; By contrast, portfolio diversification did not work for bonds, which were all &#8220;subject to the same hazards&#8221; which were &#8220;not reduced by increasing the number of different bonds held.&#8221;</p>
<p>CDO&#8217;s were said to be different because according to Felix Salmon, the overcollateralization afforded by the aggregation of sub prime mortgages meant at least some tranches could be A rated.</p>
<p>Edgar Smith wasn&#8217;t talking about this type of diversification at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
