<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Source and Spontaneous Order</title>
	<atom:link href="http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/12/28/open-source-and-spontaneous-order/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/12/28/open-source-and-spontaneous-order/</link>
	<description>Economics of organizations, strategy, entrepreneurship, innovation, and more</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 02:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roberto Galoppini</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/12/28/open-source-and-spontaneous-order/#comment-66713</link>
		<dc:creator>Roberto Galoppini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 14:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/12/28/open-source-and-spontaneous-order/#comment-66713</guid>
		<description>I personally coauthored a paper with Giampaolo Garzarelli in 2003, and we extended our common research to modularity and hierarchy &lt;a href="http://pascal.case.unibz.it/handle/2038/941" rel="nofollow"&gt;studying the Debian case&lt;/a&gt;. Here a short excerpt that might interest you:

&lt;blockquote&gt;[. . .] a pure modular structure -- that is, one lacking hierarchy, such as a market -- embeds flexibility in the form of a learning mechanism, but it lacks coherence, the ability to coevolve after adapting to change (cf., e.g., Langlois 1995). Indeed, the flexibility aspect of modularity is what pushes organizational coherence out of synchrony -- what misaligns expectations in the Hayekian sense. Hence, when a modular organization presents coherence (and is healthy), hierarchy, we submit, is bundled to its modularity because of flexibility.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally coauthored a paper with Giampaolo Garzarelli in 2003, and we extended our common research to modularity and hierarchy <a href="http://pascal.case.unibz.it/handle/2038/941" rel="nofollow">studying the Debian case</a>. Here a short excerpt that might interest you:</p>
<blockquote><p>[. . .] a pure modular structure &#8212; that is, one lacking hierarchy, such as a market &#8212; embeds flexibility in the form of a learning mechanism, but it lacks coherence, the ability to coevolve after adapting to change (cf., e.g., Langlois 1995). Indeed, the flexibility aspect of modularity is what pushes organizational coherence out of synchrony &#8212; what misaligns expectations in the Hayekian sense. Hence, when a modular organization presents coherence (and is healthy), hierarchy, we submit, is bundled to its modularity because of flexibility.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Software&#8221; livre, o discurso bolivariano da esquerda brasileira e nós &#171; De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/12/28/open-source-and-spontaneous-order/#comment-66681</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Software&#8221; livre, o discurso bolivariano da esquerda brasileira e nós &#171; De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 09:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/12/28/open-source-and-spontaneous-order/#comment-66681</guid>
		<description>[...] outro comentário é do Organization and Markets, e está aqui. Como se vê, há muito mais entre o céu e a terra do que supõem nossos estúpidos políticos e [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] outro comentário é do Organization and Markets, e está aqui. Como se vê, há muito mais entre o céu e a terra do que supõem nossos estúpidos políticos e [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nordsieck</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/12/28/open-source-and-spontaneous-order/#comment-66618</link>
		<dc:creator>nordsieck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 19:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/12/28/open-source-and-spontaneous-order/#comment-66618</guid>
		<description>Open Source projects also involve a definite ownership pattern as well.  While it is true that anyone can "fork" a project, it is impossible to steal the original project's reputation for quality and reliability.  In practice, then, ownership and hierarchy exist, organized by the ability to make changes to some or all of the software, contingent on varying degrees of oversight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Open Source projects also involve a definite ownership pattern as well.  While it is true that anyone can &#8220;fork&#8221; a project, it is impossible to steal the original project&#8217;s reputation for quality and reliability.  In practice, then, ownership and hierarchy exist, organized by the ability to make changes to some or all of the software, contingent on varying degrees of oversight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
