<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Most Popular Posts of 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/12/31/most-popular-posts-of-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/12/31/most-popular-posts-of-2007/</link>
	<description>Economics of organizations, strategy, entrepreneurship, innovation, and more</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CoreEcon &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Top Posts of 2007</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/12/31/most-popular-posts-of-2007/#comment-66949</link>
		<dc:creator>CoreEcon &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Top Posts of 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 22:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/12/31/most-popular-posts-of-2007/#comment-66949</guid>
		<description>[...] Following on from the example of others, here are this blog&#8217;s top posts (by 2007 pageviews) of 2007: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Following on from the example of others, here are this blog&#8217;s top posts (by 2007 pageviews) of 2007: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Klein</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/12/31/most-popular-posts-of-2007/#comment-66935</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Klein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 20:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/12/31/most-popular-posts-of-2007/#comment-66935</guid>
		<description>Warren, thanks for the kind words. On the dates, I should have specified that these are the "posts that were the most popular in 2007," not the "posts from 2007 that were the most popular." 

As for Postrel: Why do you think we got rid of him? :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Warren, thanks for the kind words. On the dates, I should have specified that these are the &#8220;posts that were the most popular in 2007,&#8221; not the &#8220;posts from 2007 that were the most popular.&#8221; </p>
<p>As for Postrel: Why do you think we got rid of him? :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warren Miller</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/12/31/most-popular-posts-of-2007/#comment-66934</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 20:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/12/31/most-popular-posts-of-2007/#comment-66934</guid>
		<description>Peter, thank you for citing "The SWOT Model." I went to it eagerly because I hadn't seen it before and also because it's a framework we use all the time in our professional work advising mid-sized firms. 

FWIW, it appears to have been a 2006 post. That was before I knew you guys existed, so I hadn't seen it. Was delighted to find the Makadok paper, which I also hadn't seen; I admire Rich's work a lot.

Since today is a lazy day of sorts around here, I clicked through all 20 of the "top posts." Found out that five--#7, 9, 10, 18, 20--appear to have come from 2006. Hmmmm. And did you know that four of the top six came from guest blogger Postrel? How do we get him back?! :-)

Thanks for all the fine work this blog does, and Happy New Year to all. Let's hope that 2008 is happy, healthful, and prosperous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter, thank you for citing &#8220;The SWOT Model.&#8221; I went to it eagerly because I hadn&#8217;t seen it before and also because it&#8217;s a framework we use all the time in our professional work advising mid-sized firms. </p>
<p>FWIW, it appears to have been a 2006 post. That was before I knew you guys existed, so I hadn&#8217;t seen it. Was delighted to find the Makadok paper, which I also hadn&#8217;t seen; I admire Rich&#8217;s work a lot.</p>
<p>Since today is a lazy day of sorts around here, I clicked through all 20 of the &#8220;top posts.&#8221; Found out that five&#8211;#7, 9, 10, 18, 20&#8211;appear to have come from 2006. Hmmmm. And did you know that four of the top six came from guest blogger Postrel? How do we get him back?! :-)</p>
<p>Thanks for all the fine work this blog does, and Happy New Year to all. Let&#8217;s hope that 2008 is happy, healthful, and prosperous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
