<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;The Age of Temporary Advantage&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2008/01/18/the-age-of-temporary-advantage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2008/01/18/the-age-of-temporary-advantage/</link>
	<description>Economics of organizations, strategy, entrepreneurship, innovation, and more</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 02:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Carson</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2008/01/18/the-age-of-temporary-advantage/#comment-69271</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Carson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2008/01/18/the-age-of-temporary-advantage/#comment-69271</guid>
		<description>My guess is that a great deal of "comparative advantage" is artificial, based on state-created barriers to the diffusion of knowledge and skill in a competitive economy.  For example, there's a considerable overlap between the concept of comparative advantage and what Chandler called "organizational capability."  And the substance of much of the latter is suggested by Chandler's own history of the tech industry, much of which consists of an extended account of which patents were owned by which firms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess is that a great deal of &#8220;comparative advantage&#8221; is artificial, based on state-created barriers to the diffusion of knowledge and skill in a competitive economy.  For example, there&#8217;s a considerable overlap between the concept of comparative advantage and what Chandler called &#8220;organizational capability.&#8221;  And the substance of much of the latter is suggested by Chandler&#8217;s own history of the tech industry, much of which consists of an extended account of which patents were owned by which firms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
