<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Porter&#8217;s Five Forces, Updated</title>
	<atom:link href="http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2008/02/05/porters-five-forces-updated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2008/02/05/porters-five-forces-updated/</link>
	<description>Economics of organizations, strategy, entrepreneurship, innovation, and more</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 05:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ian Pratt</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2008/02/05/porters-five-forces-updated/#comment-70556</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Pratt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.wordpress.com/?p=1358#comment-70556</guid>
		<description>It is always fascinated to read debate and discussion around strategic theory. However, I am curious why there is a reference to Porter down playing the relevance of internal resources. 

In recent times, I have always completed the industry analysis using Porters Five Forces and then completed the internal analysis looking at the firm’s resources.

However this does raise the question, if you truly have a competitive advantage do you really have any competitors and if you have differentiated your business based on, say, customer service what is the role of the industry analysis?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is always fascinated to read debate and discussion around strategic theory. However, I am curious why there is a reference to Porter down playing the relevance of internal resources. </p>
<p>In recent times, I have always completed the industry analysis using Porters Five Forces and then completed the internal analysis looking at the firm’s resources.</p>
<p>However this does raise the question, if you truly have a competitive advantage do you really have any competitors and if you have differentiated your business based on, say, customer service what is the role of the industry analysis?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Porter and the 5 Forces &#171; A Business Professor&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2008/02/05/porters-five-forces-updated/#comment-69434</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Porter and the 5 Forces &#171; A Business Professor&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 05:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.wordpress.com/?p=1358#comment-69434</guid>
		<description>[...] 05, 2008 by abusinessprofessor    Professor Klein&#8217;s blog drew my attention to a new Harvard Business Review article by Michael Porter, who many believe is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 05, 2008 by abusinessprofessor    Professor Klein&#8217;s blog drew my attention to a new Harvard Business Review article by Michael Porter, who many believe is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
