<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Nature of the (Law) Firm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2008/04/23/the-nature-of-the-law-firm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2008/04/23/the-nature-of-the-law-firm/</link>
	<description>Economics of organizations, strategy, entrepreneurship, innovation, and more</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 05:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael F. Martin</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2008/04/23/the-nature-of-the-law-firm/#comment-70705</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael F. Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 15:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.wordpress.com/?p=1500#comment-70705</guid>
		<description>The ethical rules were never in place for any good reasons to begin with:

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1148431

Why does the public generally despise lawyers?  Because they know greedy protectionism when they see it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ethical rules were never in place for any good reasons to begin with:</p>
<p><a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1148431" rel="nofollow">http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1148431</a></p>
<p>Why does the public generally despise lawyers?  Because they know greedy protectionism when they see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Klein</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2008/04/23/the-nature-of-the-law-firm/#comment-70177</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Klein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.wordpress.com/?p=1500#comment-70177</guid>
		<description>Warren, yes, that's what I understand from conversations with Gordon. What I meant was why shouldn't they be allowed to? Is there an efficiency reason for restricting non-employee ownership?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Warren, yes, that&#8217;s what I understand from conversations with Gordon. What I meant was why shouldn&#8217;t they be allowed to? Is there an efficiency reason for restricting non-employee ownership?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warren Miller</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2008/04/23/the-nature-of-the-law-firm/#comment-70171</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 04:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.wordpress.com/?p=1500#comment-70171</guid>
		<description>Peter, I believe that law firms can't do IPOs for the same reason that CPA firms can't: statutes that restrict who can own an equity interest in such firms. There are no such statutes for consulting firms.

To my knowledge, there has been but one attempt to circumvent the CPA-firm restriction: Century Business Services, Inc., now CBIZ Inc. It's had a rocky, up-and-down existence. CBIZ offers every service a typical CPA firm does, except "assurance services" (audits and reviews). For those, it has an affiliate that, on its website, CBIZ goes to some lengths to emphasize is owned by CPAs and is a separate legal entity. Link: http://www.cbiz.com/page.asp?pid=3104. So I guess CBIZ is, in reality, a consulting firm with a CPA-firm sibling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter, I believe that law firms can&#8217;t do IPOs for the same reason that CPA firms can&#8217;t: statutes that restrict who can own an equity interest in such firms. There are no such statutes for consulting firms.</p>
<p>To my knowledge, there has been but one attempt to circumvent the CPA-firm restriction: Century Business Services, Inc., now CBIZ Inc. It&#8217;s had a rocky, up-and-down existence. CBIZ offers every service a typical CPA firm does, except &#8220;assurance services&#8221; (audits and reviews). For those, it has an affiliate that, on its website, CBIZ goes to some lengths to emphasize is owned by CPAs and is a separate legal entity. Link: <a href="http://www.cbiz.com/page.asp?pid=3104" rel="nofollow">http://www.cbiz.com/page.asp?pid=3104</a>. So I guess CBIZ is, in reality, a consulting firm with a CPA-firm sibling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nl</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2008/04/23/the-nature-of-the-law-firm/#comment-70148</link>
		<dc:creator>nl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.wordpress.com/?p=1500#comment-70148</guid>
		<description>you might also want to look at Andrew von Nordenflycht's work</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you might also want to look at Andrew von Nordenflycht&#8217;s work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nl</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2008/04/23/the-nature-of-the-law-firm/#comment-70147</link>
		<dc:creator>nl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.wordpress.com/?p=1500#comment-70147</guid>
		<description>There's some stuff in org econ theory on why the partnership form - Rebitzer and Taylor JOLE 07, Bar-Isaac RAND 08, Levin and Tadelis QJE 2005. 
George Baker has a law review article with Rachel Parkin reporting on some empirical work on the legal profession.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s some stuff in org econ theory on why the partnership form - Rebitzer and Taylor JOLE 07, Bar-Isaac RAND 08, Levin and Tadelis QJE 2005.<br />
George Baker has a law review article with Rachel Parkin reporting on some empirical work on the legal profession.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2008/04/23/the-nature-of-the-law-firm/#comment-70144</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 14:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.wordpress.com/?p=1500#comment-70144</guid>
		<description>"Managing the Professional Services Firm" (&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Managing-Professional-Service-David-Maister/dp/0684834316" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.amazon.com/Managing-Professional-Service-David-Maister/dp/0684834316&lt;/a&gt;) is an absolute must read to understand the basic concepts for running a firm of any nature. It explains basic and semi-advanced concepts of organizational structure, leverage, and other aspests of a firm's makeup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Managing the Professional Services Firm&#8221; (<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Managing-Professional-Service-David-Maister/dp/0684834316" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Managing-Professional-Service-David-Maister/dp/0684834316</a>) is an absolute must read to understand the basic concepts for running a firm of any nature. It explains basic and semi-advanced concepts of organizational structure, leverage, and other aspests of a firm&#8217;s makeup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
