<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McNamara on Management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2008/08/19/mcnamara-on-management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2008/08/19/mcnamara-on-management/</link>
	<description>Economics of organizations, strategy, entrepreneurship, innovation, and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 03:46:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eats Wombats</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2008/08/19/mcnamara-on-management/#comment-74866</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eats Wombats]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 12:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.wordpress.com/?p=2060#comment-74866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s a good critique of McNamara in Henry Mintzberg&#039;s Managers not MBAs, but not just of McNamara but the whole reductionist point-missing obsession with measurement -- as part of a broader thesis about the damaging effects of an HBS education. 

At least the numbers guys could claim to be empiricists. What excuse does George Bush have?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a good critique of McNamara in Henry Mintzberg&#8217;s Managers not MBAs, but not just of McNamara but the whole reductionist point-missing obsession with measurement &#8212; as part of a broader thesis about the damaging effects of an HBS education. </p>
<p>At least the numbers guys could claim to be empiricists. What excuse does George Bush have?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

