<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nationalization of US Credit Markets: Where Is the Analysis?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2008/09/29/nationalization-of-us-credit-markets-where-is-the-analysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2008/09/29/nationalization-of-us-credit-markets-where-is-the-analysis/</link>
	<description>Economics of organizations, strategy, entrepreneurship, innovation, and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 21:27:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Praja Rajyam</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2008/09/29/nationalization-of-us-credit-markets-where-is-the-analysis/#comment-71582</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Praja Rajyam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 08:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.wordpress.com/?p=2532#comment-71582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What we are foreseeing is a mixed-economy where regulators will be crucial. If we have more &#039;failures&#039; there will be more burden on the tax payer (on account of bail outs) - but, when there is a success, they don&#039;t share the profits with the tax-payer. Don&#039;t you think this is unfair?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What we are foreseeing is a mixed-economy where regulators will be crucial. If we have more &#8216;failures&#8217; there will be more burden on the tax payer (on account of bail outs) &#8211; but, when there is a success, they don&#8217;t share the profits with the tax-payer. Don&#8217;t you think this is unfair?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spostrel</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2008/09/29/nationalization-of-us-credit-markets-where-is-the-analysis/#comment-71567</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[spostrel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 23:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.wordpress.com/?p=2532#comment-71567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree that the analysis is thin. What seems to be driving the policymakers at Fed and Treasury is a set of unprecedented market events such as a collapse of interbank lending. It is not clear that these events are the harbingers of immediate Depression, however, nor is it clear that the proposed intervention will even have the desired positive effects in return for the negatives mentioned in Peter&#039;s post.

If we are going to have a government-as-hedge-fund intervention aimed at preventing temporary liquidity problems from causing contagious credit collapses, I would prefer to temporarily (say for six months) offer a guarantee of high-quality borrowers, especially industrial AAA commercial paper (possibly in return for a fee of a few basis points). In all lilelihood, this will cost the taxpayers nothing and it will let all the solvent firms meet their payrolls.

With this approach we aren&#039;t &quot;bailing out&quot; anybody, just preventing the contagion until we can sort out the MBS, CDO, and CDS markets with tough restructurings. Those restructurings will essentially have to convert debt contracts to equity contracts, under some guise. Much of this restructuring might go forward with minimal government involvement.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the analysis is thin. What seems to be driving the policymakers at Fed and Treasury is a set of unprecedented market events such as a collapse of interbank lending. It is not clear that these events are the harbingers of immediate Depression, however, nor is it clear that the proposed intervention will even have the desired positive effects in return for the negatives mentioned in Peter&#8217;s post.</p>
<p>If we are going to have a government-as-hedge-fund intervention aimed at preventing temporary liquidity problems from causing contagious credit collapses, I would prefer to temporarily (say for six months) offer a guarantee of high-quality borrowers, especially industrial AAA commercial paper (possibly in return for a fee of a few basis points). In all lilelihood, this will cost the taxpayers nothing and it will let all the solvent firms meet their payrolls.</p>
<p>With this approach we aren&#8217;t &#8220;bailing out&#8221; anybody, just preventing the contagion until we can sort out the MBS, CDO, and CDS markets with tough restructurings. Those restructurings will essentially have to convert debt contracts to equity contracts, under some guise. Much of this restructuring might go forward with minimal government involvement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sr&#38;ed</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2008/09/29/nationalization-of-us-credit-markets-where-is-the-analysis/#comment-71563</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sr&#38;ed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.wordpress.com/?p=2532#comment-71563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s wrong with letting some more of these businesses fail?  Bailouts will make companies less competitive in the long run.  Shouldn&#039;t businesses that make bad business suffer the repercussions of their decisions?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s wrong with letting some more of these businesses fail?  Bailouts will make companies less competitive in the long run.  Shouldn&#8217;t businesses that make bad business suffer the repercussions of their decisions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TRUTH ON THE MARKET &#187; Questions on the Bailout</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2008/09/29/nationalization-of-us-credit-markets-where-is-the-analysis/#comment-71562</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TRUTH ON THE MARKET &#187; Questions on the Bailout]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.wordpress.com/?p=2532#comment-71562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Peter Klein: Over and over during the last week we’ve been told that unless Congress, the Treasury, and the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Peter Klein: Over and over during the last week we’ve been told that unless Congress, the Treasury, and the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

