<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Game Theory Timeline</title>
	<atom:link href="http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2009/02/23/game-theory-timeline/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2009/02/23/game-theory-timeline/</link>
	<description>Economics of organizations, strategy, entrepreneurship, innovation, and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 19:17:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Walker</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2009/02/23/game-theory-timeline/#comment-73124</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Walker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 02:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.com/?p=4656#comment-73124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The short answer to your question is that I haven&#039;t been keeping up as well as I should have. Added to that is the problem these days of working out what is game theory, as such, and what is econ or pols or biology etc. Game theory is so much part of other areas now that&#039;s it&#039;s difficult to workout what is game theory and what isn&#039;t. The whole page needs a rewrite so if anyone has some ideas on what should be included post-94 let me know.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The short answer to your question is that I haven&#8217;t been keeping up as well as I should have. Added to that is the problem these days of working out what is game theory, as such, and what is econ or pols or biology etc. Game theory is so much part of other areas now that&#8217;s it&#8217;s difficult to workout what is game theory and what isn&#8217;t. The whole page needs a rewrite so if anyone has some ideas on what should be included post-94 let me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafe Champion</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2009/02/23/game-theory-timeline/#comment-73075</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rafe Champion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.com/?p=4656#comment-73075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For what it is worth I have mailed the author to find out. 

There is an entry for  the Aumann and Schelling Nobel Prize in 2005 

Interesting 1981 development
1981 
R. J. Aumann published a Survey of Repeated Games. This survey firstly proposed the idea of applying the notion of an automaton to describe a player in a repeated game. A second idea from the survey is to study the interactive behaviour of bounded players by studying a game with appropriately restricted set of strategies. These ideas have given birth to a large and growing literature. 

What if they had used the notion of a human being playing in a repeated game like criket or baseball?
http://www.the-rathouse.com/EvenMoreAustrianProgram/OffspinneronReductionvsExistence.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it is worth I have mailed the author to find out. </p>
<p>There is an entry for  the Aumann and Schelling Nobel Prize in 2005 </p>
<p>Interesting 1981 development<br />
1981<br />
R. J. Aumann published a Survey of Repeated Games. This survey firstly proposed the idea of applying the notion of an automaton to describe a player in a repeated game. A second idea from the survey is to study the interactive behaviour of bounded players by studying a game with appropriately restricted set of strategies. These ideas have given birth to a large and growing literature. </p>
<p>What if they had used the notion of a human being playing in a repeated game like criket or baseball?<br />
<a href="http://www.the-rathouse.com/EvenMoreAustrianProgram/OffspinneronReductionvsExistence.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.the-rathouse.com/EvenMoreAustrianProgram/OffspinneronReductionvsExistence.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

