<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bad to Awful?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2009/05/16/bad-to-awful/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2009/05/16/bad-to-awful/</link>
	<description>Economics of organizations, strategy, entrepreneurship, innovation, and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:13:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links for May 24 2009 &#124; Eric D. Brown - Technology, Strategy, People &#38; Projects</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2009/05/16/bad-to-awful/#comment-74292</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Links for May 24 2009 &#124; Eric D. Brown - Technology, Strategy, People &#38; Projects]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 17:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.com/?p=5762#comment-74292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Bad to Awful? by Peter Klein on Organizations and Markets [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bad to Awful? by Peter Klein on Organizations and Markets [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lasse</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2009/05/16/bad-to-awful/#comment-74237</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lasse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 10:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.com/?p=5762#comment-74237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Awsome plan, I&#039;m in.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awsome plan, I&#8217;m in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Carden</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2009/05/16/bad-to-awful/#comment-74235</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Art Carden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 21:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.com/?p=5762#comment-74235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it&#039;s time we make good on our plans to become management gurus.  I propose a three-part series: &quot;The Awesomeness Paradigm,&quot; &quot;The Appearance of Awesomeness: When Awesomeness Fails,&quot; and &quot;Anti-Awesomeness.&quot;  The first book will explore profitable companies (Google, Starbucks, Walmart).  The second will explore flashes in the pan that spiked after their IPOs and that have come back to Earth (Krispy Kreme, a lot of tech companies).  The third will explore companies that made terrible products and that no longer exist.  Our &quot;Awesomeness Advice&quot; will be &quot;focus on maximizing profits,&quot; and we&#039;ll make a handful of suggestions that are specific enough to sound compelling but vague enough to not actually mean anything.  Interested?  Or am I just being cynical about management fads?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s time we make good on our plans to become management gurus.  I propose a three-part series: &#8220;The Awesomeness Paradigm,&#8221; &#8220;The Appearance of Awesomeness: When Awesomeness Fails,&#8221; and &#8220;Anti-Awesomeness.&#8221;  The first book will explore profitable companies (Google, Starbucks, Walmart).  The second will explore flashes in the pan that spiked after their IPOs and that have come back to Earth (Krispy Kreme, a lot of tech companies).  The third will explore companies that made terrible products and that no longer exist.  Our &#8220;Awesomeness Advice&#8221; will be &#8220;focus on maximizing profits,&#8221; and we&#8217;ll make a handful of suggestions that are specific enough to sound compelling but vague enough to not actually mean anything.  Interested?  Or am I just being cynical about management fads?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

