<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Macroeconomic Theory Influence Macroeconomic Policy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2009/06/30/does-macroeconomic-theory-influence-macroeconomic-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2009/06/30/does-macroeconomic-theory-influence-macroeconomic-policy/</link>
	<description>Economics of organizations, strategy, entrepreneurship, innovation, and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 21:27:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James A. Donald</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2009/06/30/does-macroeconomic-theory-influence-macroeconomic-policy/#comment-75321</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James A. Donald]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 20:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.com/?p=6166#comment-75321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Greg Ransom tells us that macroeconomists must have influenced their masters because their masters commended them.

That the powerful commend their courtiers is not evidence that the courtiers are influencing the ideas of their masters, rather it is evidence that the courtiers are successful in flattering their masters that the programs of their masters, chosen for wholly political reasons, are wise and good.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg Ransom tells us that macroeconomists must have influenced their masters because their masters commended them.</p>
<p>That the powerful commend their courtiers is not evidence that the courtiers are influencing the ideas of their masters, rather it is evidence that the courtiers are successful in flattering their masters that the programs of their masters, chosen for wholly political reasons, are wise and good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Ransom</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2009/06/30/does-macroeconomic-theory-influence-macroeconomic-policy/#comment-74681</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Ransom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 04:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.com/?p=6166#comment-74681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The influence of Foster and Catchings on Hoover was direct -- he wrote the approving introduction to one of their books.

F &amp; C also influenced Sen. Wagner &amp; FDR -- as well as most economists in America.

It can even be argued that Keynes is simply a British/Marshall interpretation of F &amp; C.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The influence of Foster and Catchings on Hoover was direct &#8212; he wrote the approving introduction to one of their books.</p>
<p>F &amp; C also influenced Sen. Wagner &amp; FDR &#8212; as well as most economists in America.</p>
<p>It can even be argued that Keynes is simply a British/Marshall interpretation of F &amp; C.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

