Page and Reference Counts: AER versus AJS

24 September 2009 at 11:42 am 5 comments

| Peter Klein |

Thanks to Teppo for linking to these interesting graphs. Since 1960, the page count and reference list of the average American Journal of Sociology article have risen dramatically, while those for the American Economic Review have remained about the same. I’d be curious to see these figures for the Academy of Management periodicals as well. What explains these trends? Are sociologists simply more verbose than economists?

Update: Here are some more graphs, this time including ASQ and Management Science, as well as some additional sociology journals. ASQ and MS appear to be somewhere in the middle.

Entry filed under: - Klein -, Methods/Methodology/Theory of Science. Tags: .

John Gray on the Greenspan-Bernanke Economy The Soviets Really Did Have a Doomsday Machine

5 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Mark  |  24 September 2009 at 1:40 pm

    According to the data, yes, sociologists are more verbose than economists! Now, is that an individual preference, or an institutionalized norm to which they are conforming? :)

  • 2. stevphel  |  24 September 2009 at 6:36 pm

    My paper on the first twenty years of the SMJ also indicates an increase in page counts and references:

    http://faculty.unlv.edu/phelan/PhelanFerreiraSalvador_The%20first%20twenty%20years%20of%20the%20SMJ.pdf

    so it’s not just sociologists ;-)

  • 3. srp  |  24 September 2009 at 6:59 pm

    Hypothesis: Management and sociology reviewers expect every article to read like a literature review. As a result, more and more citations are needed over time as the literature grows and each article becomes longer. Economists are a lot less concerned with who said what in the past (to the extent of occasionally publishing results that were already published years before) and so their articles do not get longer over time.

  • 4. stevphel  |  24 September 2009 at 8:13 pm

    Some have attributed it to a lack of a dominant paradigm in management and sociology so there is more space needed to justify a position whereas economists can just talk about their contribution.

  • 5. sycophant  |  25 September 2009 at 12:23 am

    Drawing on the work of Derek J. de Solla Price, Robert K. Merton noted, in 1968, that 60 to 70 percent of citations in the physical sciences referred to publications of the preceding five years; in the humanities the figures ranged from 10 to 20 percent; and in the social sciences the figures ranged from 30 to 50 percent. Indeed it is likely that in the social sciences, economics articles were citing more recent publications, and less of them. Yet, my sense is that since the 1960s the pattern of citations in sociology articles has also changed, and there has been a move in all the social sciences toward the pattern of citations of the physical sciences.

    Isaac W.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Authors

Nicolai J. Foss | home | posts
Peter G. Klein | home | posts
Richard Langlois | home | posts
Lasse B. Lien | home | posts

Guests

Former Guests | posts

Networking

Recent Posts

Categories

Feeds

Our Recent Books

Nicolai J. Foss and Peter G. Klein, Organizing Entrepreneurial Judgment: A New Approach to the Firm (Cambridge University Press, 2012).
Peter G. Klein and Micheal E. Sykuta, eds., The Elgar Companion to Transaction Cost Economics (Edward Elgar, 2010).
Peter G. Klein, The Capitalist and the Entrepreneur: Essays on Organizations and Markets (Mises Institute, 2010).
Richard N. Langlois, The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism: Schumpeter, Chandler, and the New Economy (Routledge, 2007).
Nicolai J. Foss, Strategy, Economic Organization, and the Knowledge Economy: The Coordination of Firms and Resources (Oxford University Press, 2005).
Raghu Garud, Arun Kumaraswamy, and Richard N. Langlois, eds., Managing in the Modular Age: Architectures, Networks and Organizations (Blackwell, 2003).
Nicolai J. Foss and Peter G. Klein, eds., Entrepreneurship and the Firm: Austrian Perspectives on Economic Organization (Elgar, 2002).
Nicolai J. Foss and Volker Mahnke, eds., Competence, Governance, and Entrepreneurship: Advances in Economic Strategy Research (Oxford, 2000).
Nicolai J. Foss and Paul L. Robertson, eds., Resources, Technology, and Strategy: Explorations in the Resource-based Perspective (Routledge, 2000).

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 269 other followers