<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum&#8221;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2010/07/18/de-gustibus-non-est-disputandum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2010/07/18/de-gustibus-non-est-disputandum/</link>
	<description>Economics of organizations, strategy, entrepreneurship, innovation, and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 08:11:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dagens anbefalinger &#124; Hedegaard</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2010/07/18/de-gustibus-non-est-disputandum/#comment-80472</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dagens anbefalinger &#124; Hedegaard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 08:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.com/?p=9597#comment-80472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] “De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum”? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] “De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum”? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Hoopes</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2010/07/18/de-gustibus-non-est-disputandum/#comment-80393</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Hoopes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 20:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.com/?p=9597#comment-80393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In strategy and marketing heterogeneity of preferences is pretty important. If one is interested in firm (or competitive) heterogeneity or sustained competitive advantage how actors vary in their preferences and utility functions can still be explored. The basic problem of allowing preferences and utility functions (and beliefs for that matter) to vary across actors is that it greatly complicates the theory and can lead to trivial seeming conclusions. The latter because as is often pointed out, you can explain almost anything if everyone wants different things. Danny Miller and I address some of the preferences/utility function issues in a very simple agency theory model discussing ownership concentration and family business.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In strategy and marketing heterogeneity of preferences is pretty important. If one is interested in firm (or competitive) heterogeneity or sustained competitive advantage how actors vary in their preferences and utility functions can still be explored. The basic problem of allowing preferences and utility functions (and beliefs for that matter) to vary across actors is that it greatly complicates the theory and can lead to trivial seeming conclusions. The latter because as is often pointed out, you can explain almost anything if everyone wants different things. Danny Miller and I address some of the preferences/utility function issues in a very simple agency theory model discussing ownership concentration and family business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

