Report on the North Conference

17 November 2010 at 5:56 pm 1 comment

| Peter Klein |

Responsibilities abroad kept me from attending the recent Douglass North celebration, but the University of Missouri was well represented by a group of energetic and enthusiastic PhD students, who sent me the following report:

The conference on Legacy and Work of Douglass North was an outstanding meeting with discussions on the past, present, and future of the New Institutional Economics. Top scholars discussed the contribution and influence of North (and the New Institutional Economics) in a diverse range of fields, covering everything from the impact of the initial contributions to the outlook for continued research.

It’s hard to summarize the insights and contributions from six paper sessions, Elinor Ostrom’s keynote, and the roundtable on North and the Rise of the New Institutional Economics. One takeaway was the depth and breadth of North’s contributions – many speakers were North coauthors working on a wide variety of topics, from many different perspectives (economics, political science, history, cognition, etc.). North’s influence is huge across the social sciences.

One burning issue: what’s the next step for New Institutional Economics? Besides bridging or integrating Northean institutional analysis with Williamsonian organizational economics, many speakers emphasized the need to be more rigorous, to examine more details, to go farther than the “big picture” studies that are so prominent in the field. There are too many grand, sweeping claims, and not enough mundane, middle-of-the-road analysis. (John Nye, for example, expressed concern that some Northean ideas are very difficult to operationalize, a particular problem since younger scholars are confronted with very high standards for formalization, empirical technique, etc.)

What methods are most appropriate for studying these details? Several papers displayed new and interesting methods, techniques, approaches, etc. for applying Northean concepts to real-life phenomena and small-scale problems of much lesser scope. The context of empirical analysis is very important. Ostrom’s embrace of multiple methods — case studies, meta-analysis, comparative studies, game theory, experimental economics, etc. – provides one model. Ostrom’s success should serve as a model for many researchers in the New Institutional Economics. Unfortunately, there weren’t a lot of details; Sebastián Galliani’s session, which featured mostly younger scholars, focused on empirical methods but this wasn’t a major theme of the rest of the program. The best discussion on method was Ostrom’s keynote, which discussed the benefits of using existing case studies to produce a sort of empirical meta-analysis to support one’s case. Indeed, the perceived need to create an original dataset may push graduate students to pursue novelty over substance and usefulness; old data can be a great source for empirical analysis! [Editor’s note: I’m reminded of a conversation with Ronald Coase in which he worried that empirical contract researchers focus too much on getting new data, most of which is of course proprietary, while ignoring the treasure trove of archival data, e.g., procurement contracts from 100 years ago, much of which firms are happy to share.]

Entry filed under: - Klein -, Business/Economic History, Conferences, Evolutionary Economics, Institutions, New Institutional Economics, People, Public Policy / Political Economy. Tags: .

Blinder: Keynesianism is Right, Because Keynesians Are Really Smart Mirowski on Backhouse and Fontaine, eds., The History of the Social Sciences since 1945

1 Comment Add your own

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Nicolai J. Foss | home | posts
Peter G. Klein | home | posts
Richard Langlois | home | posts
Lasse B. Lien | home | posts


Former Guests | posts


Recent Posts



Our Recent Books

Nicolai J. Foss and Peter G. Klein, Organizing Entrepreneurial Judgment: A New Approach to the Firm (Cambridge University Press, 2012).
Peter G. Klein and Micheal E. Sykuta, eds., The Elgar Companion to Transaction Cost Economics (Edward Elgar, 2010).
Peter G. Klein, The Capitalist and the Entrepreneur: Essays on Organizations and Markets (Mises Institute, 2010).
Richard N. Langlois, The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism: Schumpeter, Chandler, and the New Economy (Routledge, 2007).
Nicolai J. Foss, Strategy, Economic Organization, and the Knowledge Economy: The Coordination of Firms and Resources (Oxford University Press, 2005).
Raghu Garud, Arun Kumaraswamy, and Richard N. Langlois, eds., Managing in the Modular Age: Architectures, Networks and Organizations (Blackwell, 2003).
Nicolai J. Foss and Peter G. Klein, eds., Entrepreneurship and the Firm: Austrian Perspectives on Economic Organization (Elgar, 2002).
Nicolai J. Foss and Volker Mahnke, eds., Competence, Governance, and Entrepreneurship: Advances in Economic Strategy Research (Oxford, 2000).
Nicolai J. Foss and Paul L. Robertson, eds., Resources, Technology, and Strategy: Explorations in the Resource-based Perspective (Routledge, 2000).


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 218 other followers