<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Organizations and Markets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://organizationsandmarkets.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com</link>
	<description>Economics of organizations, strategy, entrepreneurship, innovation, and more</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 11:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Politically Incorrect Company Logos by David Hoopes</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2008/05/11/politically-incorrect-company-logos/#comment-70342</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hoopes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 03:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.wordpress.com/?p=1538#comment-70342</guid>
		<description>Megaflicks!!! LOL!! Amazing. That's really funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Megaflicks!!! LOL!! Amazing. That&#8217;s really funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Politically Incorrect Company Logos by Mrs. Miller</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2008/05/11/politically-incorrect-company-logos/#comment-70339</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrs. Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 00:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.wordpress.com/?p=1538#comment-70339</guid>
		<description>You may want to delete this right away...it's in poor taste...  My husband's grandmother lives in Port Richie, FL, where this video store operates.  I think the font was a bad choice: 

http://www.cinematical.com/2005/10/03/caption-this-what-megaflicks-its-a-video-store/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may want to delete this right away&#8230;it&#8217;s in poor taste&#8230;  My husband&#8217;s grandmother lives in Port Richie, FL, where this video store operates.  I think the font was a bad choice: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2005/10/03/caption-this-what-megaflicks-its-a-video-store/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cinematical.com/2005/10/03/caption-this-what-megaflicks-its-a-video-store/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Politically Incorrect Company Logos by Vedran</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2008/05/11/politically-incorrect-company-logos/#comment-70336</link>
		<dc:creator>Vedran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 16:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.wordpress.com/?p=1538#comment-70336</guid>
		<description>I never even looked closer at the Sherwin Williams symbol despite living right next to a store for years.  That's funny</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never even looked closer at the Sherwin Williams symbol despite living right next to a store for years.  That&#8217;s funny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Politically Incorrect Company Logos by Mark</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2008/05/11/politically-incorrect-company-logos/#comment-70333</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 12:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.wordpress.com/?p=1538#comment-70333</guid>
		<description>Alright Peter. Here is one of the best.

http://www.simonperry.org/arlington-pediatric-center-the-worst-logo-ever/

You can only hope the designer was fired for this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright Peter. Here is one of the best.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.simonperry.org/arlington-pediatric-center-the-worst-logo-ever/" rel="nofollow">http://www.simonperry.org/arlington-pediatric-center-the-worst-logo-ever/</a></p>
<p>You can only hope the designer was fired for this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Top Business Gurus by David Hoopes</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2008/05/07/top-business-gurus/#comment-70328</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hoopes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 05:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.wordpress.com/?p=1524#comment-70328</guid>
		<description>I think the term guru leaves open whether the person really knows anything or not. I think it implies the person is one whom others follow with cult-like devotion. Thus, we needn't feel bad that the list hardly characterizes the most important thinkers in business or management. It simply lists the names that get bandied around the most. I think Randy's list leans much more towards legitimate intellectual leaders. 

I forgot which journal did it, but there was an article a while back asking Nobel winning economists which papers they thought were the most important. Keynes book was the only thing on every list (including Friedman and Stigler's).

Perhaps our list should be the most important economics oriented strategy scholars. And perhaps the list should only include people whose contribution we believe to be positive. I can think of a few highly cited people whose work I think has largely led to reams of wasted paper (no names).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the term guru leaves open whether the person really knows anything or not. I think it implies the person is one whom others follow with cult-like devotion. Thus, we needn&#8217;t feel bad that the list hardly characterizes the most important thinkers in business or management. It simply lists the names that get bandied around the most. I think Randy&#8217;s list leans much more towards legitimate intellectual leaders. </p>
<p>I forgot which journal did it, but there was an article a while back asking Nobel winning economists which papers they thought were the most important. Keynes book was the only thing on every list (including Friedman and Stigler&#8217;s).</p>
<p>Perhaps our list should be the most important economics oriented strategy scholars. And perhaps the list should only include people whose contribution we believe to be positive. I can think of a few highly cited people whose work I think has largely led to reams of wasted paper (no names).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hayek on Intellectuals by Vedran</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2008/05/08/hayek-on-intellectuals/#comment-70326</link>
		<dc:creator>Vedran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 01:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.wordpress.com/?p=1537#comment-70326</guid>
		<description>Dr. Klein,

Really enjoyed the quote.  I specifically like that he refers to intellectuals performing the "role as intermediary in the spreading of ideas."  I feel that there are some people in the libertarian intellectual community who encourage only the production of new knowledge.  While Hayek seems to lay out here,that our job is not necessarily to be super smart and constantly be creating new ideas.  But instead, we should be intermediaries in spreading ideas.  Not everyone can create great new ideas, but everyone can spread them effectively. 

I feel some intellectuals in the libertarian movement spend their time in areas of idea production which is not their comparative advantage while ignoring what Hayek here sees as a goal of intellectuals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Klein,</p>
<p>Really enjoyed the quote.  I specifically like that he refers to intellectuals performing the &#8220;role as intermediary in the spreading of ideas.&#8221;  I feel that there are some people in the libertarian intellectual community who encourage only the production of new knowledge.  While Hayek seems to lay out here,that our job is not necessarily to be super smart and constantly be creating new ideas.  But instead, we should be intermediaries in spreading ideas.  Not everyone can create great new ideas, but everyone can spread them effectively. </p>
<p>I feel some intellectuals in the libertarian movement spend their time in areas of idea production which is not their comparative advantage while ignoring what Hayek here sees as a goal of intellectuals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How People Find Us by Peter Klein</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2008/05/10/how-people-find-us/#comment-70321</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Klein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 22:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.wordpress.com/?p=1536#comment-70321</guid>
		<description>It brings people to this:

http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/04/19/things-you-shouldnt-say-at-your-dissertation-defense/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It brings people to this:</p>
<p><a href="http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/04/19/things-you-shouldnt-say-at-your-dissertation-defense/" rel="nofollow">http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/04/19/things-you-shouldnt-say-at-your-dissertation-defense/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How People Find Us by Rafe Champion</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2008/05/10/how-people-find-us/#comment-70320</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafe Champion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 21:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.wordpress.com/?p=1536#comment-70320</guid>
		<description>You guys might be perplexed by #11 and #17 but what about #7?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys might be perplexed by #11 and #17 but what about #7?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Top Business Gurus by Randy Westgren</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2008/05/07/top-business-gurus/#comment-70319</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Westgren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 21:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.wordpress.com/?p=1524#comment-70319</guid>
		<description>I'll agree with All Shams to the extent  that gurus are themselves shams or quasi-experts. The WSJ list includes some serious scholars, though. I believe that the other sciences are replete with gurus, drawn from the same pools of "high scientists", publishers of popular books, media darlings, and the usual suspects that are seen at congressional hearings.

Paleontology has one of the biggest characters-as-guru: Bob Bakker (&lt;a href="http://www.hmns.org/exhibits/curators/bob_bakker.asp?r=1" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.hmns.org/exhibits/curators/bob_bakker.asp?r=1&lt;/a&gt;) who was the model for the Sam Sam Neill character in Jurassic Park. The late Harvard prof and essayist Stephen J. Gould is a guru for all time and had several guru buddies (Richard Lewontin and Nils Etheridge) and gurus nemeses (e.g. Richard Dawkins).

Physics has had many gurus such as Murray Gell-man, Edward Teller, Richard Feynman, and david Bohm. There are many in the fields of ecology, genetics, psychology, and cosmology.

How do we not count as gurus (matching the style of the WSJ business gurus) such economists as Milton Friedman, J.K. Galbraith, Steven Levitt (once called the Carl Sagan of Economics!), the erstwhile guru of the Neo-cons, Arthur Laffer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll agree with All Shams to the extent  that gurus are themselves shams or quasi-experts. The WSJ list includes some serious scholars, though. I believe that the other sciences are replete with gurus, drawn from the same pools of &#8220;high scientists&#8221;, publishers of popular books, media darlings, and the usual suspects that are seen at congressional hearings.</p>
<p>Paleontology has one of the biggest characters-as-guru: Bob Bakker (<a href="http://www.hmns.org/exhibits/curators/bob_bakker.asp?r=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.hmns.org/exhibits/curators/bob_bakker.asp?r=1</a>) who was the model for the Sam Sam Neill character in Jurassic Park. The late Harvard prof and essayist Stephen J. Gould is a guru for all time and had several guru buddies (Richard Lewontin and Nils Etheridge) and gurus nemeses (e.g. Richard Dawkins).</p>
<p>Physics has had many gurus such as Murray Gell-man, Edward Teller, Richard Feynman, and david Bohm. There are many in the fields of ecology, genetics, psychology, and cosmology.</p>
<p>How do we not count as gurus (matching the style of the WSJ business gurus) such economists as Milton Friedman, J.K. Galbraith, Steven Levitt (once called the Carl Sagan of Economics!), the erstwhile guru of the Neo-cons, Arthur Laffer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Are Brand Names a Modern Phenomenon? by Nitzan</title>
		<link>http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2008/05/03/are-brand-names-a-modern-phenomenon/#comment-70314</link>
		<dc:creator>Nitzan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 02:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organizationsandmarkets.wordpress.com/?p=1515#comment-70314</guid>
		<description>I once heard a very interesting analysis of a piece of 18th century advertising for a bun-shop (bakery) in London. The shop front was portrayed in a manner that probably enabled for easy identification, and above it this drawing, Masonic icons floated. Apparently, these were not meant to convey anything to do with a secret society, but rather were used to convey values associated with the Free Masons at that time, such as exclusivity or prestige.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I once heard a very interesting analysis of a piece of 18th century advertising for a bun-shop (bakery) in London. The shop front was portrayed in a manner that probably enabled for easy identification, and above it this drawing, Masonic icons floated. Apparently, these were not meant to convey anything to do with a secret society, but rather were used to convey values associated with the Free Masons at that time, such as exclusivity or prestige.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>