The Anti-Blog
30 August 2007
| Nicolai Foss |
One consequence of the expansion of the blogosphere is, in accordance with the basic Hegelian scheme, the emergence of the anti-blog. Here is the Anti-Becker-Posner-blog dedicated to smashing, well, you guessed it (and here is an alternative conception of what an anti-blog entails).
O&M has been accused of doing “right-wing craponomics,” Peter’s economics has been attacked by Sraffian Robert Viennau, and my comments about pomo and sociologists have often provoked angry reactions. I wonder when the Anti-O&M-Blog will appear? (Hmm, perhaps we shouldn’t play with fire; remember the Corsair Affair involving Søren Kierkegaard? (Tyler will know what I mean)).
5 Comments Add your own
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed
1.
Peter Klein | 30 August 2007 at 9:06 am
Don’t forget the two-volume Marxist critique of neoclassical economics published in the 1970s as _Anti-Samuelson_.
I guess the most famous example is Engels’s _Anti-Dühring_ (though that’s not the actual title).
2.
brayden | 30 August 2007 at 9:58 am
Hey, I thought this was the anti-sociology blog!
3.
Robert Vienneau | 31 August 2007 at 4:19 am
I had been thiinking of pointing that post on one of Peter’s posts.
Anyway, you must be falling down on your right-wingedness. Why else would Marginal Revolution take you out of their blogroll?
4.
David Gordon | 31 August 2007 at 3:37 pm
One of the most single-minded anti-blogs is Keith Burgess-Jackson’s ‘Brian Leiter: Academic Thug” http://academicthug.powerblogs.com/
5.
Nicolai Foss | 4 September 2007 at 7:11 am
Tsk-tsk, Brayden. “Anti-sociology”?? By no means; here at O&M we certainly admire James Coleman, Peter Abell, Raymond Boudon, John Goldthorpe, Victor Nee, Diego Gambetta, Michael Hechter, Karl-Dieter Opp, and Siegwardt Lindenberg. All sociologists!