Public Entrepreneurship

27 March 2009 at 5:05 am 1 comment

| Peter Klein |

A surprising aspect of the recent growth in the entrepreneurship literature is the number of papers, projects, courses, centers, etc. studying entrepreneurship in non-market settings: “social entrepreneurship,” “cultural entrepreneurship,” “environmental entrepreneurship,” and so on. At my own university students can take entrepreneurship courses not only in the Colleges of Business or Engineering but in the College of Agriculture, the School of Natural Resources, the College of Journalism, and even the School of Social Work. (One of my colleagues organized a conference last year aimed at cattle ranchers seeking to market their, um, byproducts as fertilizer, with the classic title: “Manure Entrepreneurship: Turning Brown into Green.”

Translating concepts, theories, and research methods from the entrepreneurship literature to non-market settings raises challenging issue, however. How is entrepreneurship defined? What corresponds to entrepreneurial profit and loss? What is the entrepreneur’s objective function? Are there competitive processes that select for the better entrepreneurs? None of the classic writers on entrepreneurship — Cantillon, Say, Schumpeter, Knight, Mises, Kirzner — wrote explicitly on entrepreneurship in non-market settings, as far as I am aware. Mises, in fact, distinguishes sharply between “profit management” (or entrepreneurial management) and “bureaucratic management,” identifying the former with initiative, responsibility, creativity, and novelty and the latter with rule-following within strict guidelines (see Bureaucracy, 1944, and chapter 15, section 10 of Human Action, 1949).

At the same time, we often speak colloquially of innovators in the political area acting “entrepreneurially” — Howard Jarvis taking his property-tax initiative directly to the people in a ballot measure, Barack Obama and, especially, Ron Paul raising large amounts of campaign funds through the internet, etc. Political scientists have written extensively on political or policy entrepreneurs. Can these phenomena be analyzed usefully using the language of entrepreneurship theory? Or are we simply putting new labels on old concepts?

Joe Mahoney, Anita McGahan, Christos Pitelis, and I have written a paper, “The Economic Organization of Public Entreprenership,” that reviews this literature and asks how concepts of political or public entrepreneurship might be useful in understanding firm behavior and public policy debates. Comments are welcome! Here’s the abstract:

This paper explores how management theories can be extended and applied to innovation, experimentation, and creativity in the public domain. Researchers in various disciplines have studied public entrepreneurship, but there is little research specifically on the management of organizations to innovate in the public interest. We begin by extending concepts of the entrepreneur to the public domain, and then turn to the role of the entrepreneur in fostering institutional change. The conclusion refines the institutional theory of the state to incorporate the role of entrepreneurs in organizing public and private institutions.

Entry filed under: - Klein -, Entrepreneurship, Innovation, Institutions, Law and Economics, Management Theory, Public Policy / Political Economy, Strategic Management. Tags: .

Literature Review Bleg Relative Prices Matter

1 Comment Add your own

  • 1. Rafe Champion  |  27 March 2009 at 5:47 pm

    Burton Folsom made a useful distinction beween market enterpreneurs (good) and political entrepreneurs who demonstrate their talents by obtaining government support to prop up their ventures (bad).

    Folsom identified the following people as market entrepreneurs:

    * John Jacob Astor
    * James J. Hill
    * John D. Rockefeller
    * Charles M. Schwab
    * Cornelius Vanderbilt

    He regards these people as political entrepreneurs:

    * Robert Fulton
    * Thomas McKenney
    * Henry Villard
    * Warren Buffett

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burton_W._Folsom,_Jr.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Authors

Nicolai J. Foss | home | posts
Peter G. Klein | home | posts
Richard Langlois | home | posts
Lasse B. Lien | home | posts

Guests

Former Guests | posts

Networking

Recent Posts

Categories

Feeds

Our Recent Books

Nicolai J. Foss and Peter G. Klein, Organizing Entrepreneurial Judgment: A New Approach to the Firm (Cambridge University Press, 2012).
Peter G. Klein and Micheal E. Sykuta, eds., The Elgar Companion to Transaction Cost Economics (Edward Elgar, 2010).
Peter G. Klein, The Capitalist and the Entrepreneur: Essays on Organizations and Markets (Mises Institute, 2010).
Richard N. Langlois, The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism: Schumpeter, Chandler, and the New Economy (Routledge, 2007).
Nicolai J. Foss, Strategy, Economic Organization, and the Knowledge Economy: The Coordination of Firms and Resources (Oxford University Press, 2005).
Raghu Garud, Arun Kumaraswamy, and Richard N. Langlois, eds., Managing in the Modular Age: Architectures, Networks and Organizations (Blackwell, 2003).
Nicolai J. Foss and Peter G. Klein, eds., Entrepreneurship and the Firm: Austrian Perspectives on Economic Organization (Elgar, 2002).
Nicolai J. Foss and Volker Mahnke, eds., Competence, Governance, and Entrepreneurship: Advances in Economic Strategy Research (Oxford, 2000).
Nicolai J. Foss and Paul L. Robertson, eds., Resources, Technology, and Strategy: Explorations in the Resource-based Perspective (Routledge, 2000).

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 244 other followers