Gans on Lepore on Christensen

17 June 2014 at 11:13 am 5 comments

| Peter Klein |

Josh Gans has some useful remarks on Jill Lepore’s New Yorker essay on Clayton Christensen.

Lepore only deals with the easy marks in her take down of Christensen and one suspects Christensen and his supporters can easily fend those off. It is the fundamental contradiction in taking a positive theory towards prediction that is where this entire ‘disruption industry’ falls down. I’d like to see journalists engaging more on that level so that we can be done with those bridges too far for good.

What Josh means by “fundamental contradiction” is that a disruptive technology, in Christensen’s definition, must not only be behind the cutting edge in some technical dimension, but also satisfy unmet consumer demands. The latter must be uncertain ex ante, otherwise the market leaders would also be developing the disruptive technology. Christensen advises incumbents to “disrupt themselves,” but this assumes they know which technologies will eventually be disruptive. Because they don’t, they must choose among several alternatives, including “do nothing” (i.e., try to exploit late-mover advantage).

The incumbent’s decision, contrary to Christensen’s reasoning, reflects entrepreneurial judgment, which may or may not be correct. There is no formula for managing disruptive technologies.

See also Lynne’s insightful commenta.

Entry filed under: - Klein -, Innovation, Myths and Realities, Recommended Reading, Strategic Management. Tags: .

Knowledge Elites, Inequality, and Economic Growth The Origin of Social Norms

5 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Bart Doorneweert  |  17 June 2014 at 3:11 pm

    Indeed there is no formula. The decision is about the market experiments you need to conduct to figure out what you can do with a technology. And it is experimentation that is increasingly becoming the correct way forward, a direction where incumbents usually fall short.

  • […] Peter Klein makes an important point on this: […]

  • 3. Randy  |  19 June 2014 at 7:01 am

    Luckily, experiments are costless and always supply perfect information on the markets.

  • 4. Stephen Karlson  |  21 June 2014 at 9:23 am

    It’s the cost of conducting experiments that creates the controversy! Do you free-ride on someone else’s experiment, or do you take the lead yourself? In the theoretical world, is your perspective that of hysteresis (wait for information) or cascades (don’t risk getting left behind)? In practice, just one anecdote, from Doug Preston’s American Steel: Bethlehem’s engineering department analyzed Nucor’s thin slab caster, producing a thick report (with executive summary and bullet points, no doubt; it was before presentation software) detailing all the reasons the project wouldn’t work. The rest is history.

  • […] Peter Klein makes an important point on this: […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Authors

Nicolai J. Foss | home | posts
Peter G. Klein | home | posts
Richard Langlois | home | posts
Lasse B. Lien | home | posts

Guests

Former Guests | posts

Networking

Recent Posts

Categories

Feeds

Our Recent Books

Nicolai J. Foss and Peter G. Klein, Organizing Entrepreneurial Judgment: A New Approach to the Firm (Cambridge University Press, 2012).
Peter G. Klein and Micheal E. Sykuta, eds., The Elgar Companion to Transaction Cost Economics (Edward Elgar, 2010).
Peter G. Klein, The Capitalist and the Entrepreneur: Essays on Organizations and Markets (Mises Institute, 2010).
Richard N. Langlois, The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism: Schumpeter, Chandler, and the New Economy (Routledge, 2007).
Nicolai J. Foss, Strategy, Economic Organization, and the Knowledge Economy: The Coordination of Firms and Resources (Oxford University Press, 2005).
Raghu Garud, Arun Kumaraswamy, and Richard N. Langlois, eds., Managing in the Modular Age: Architectures, Networks and Organizations (Blackwell, 2003).
Nicolai J. Foss and Peter G. Klein, eds., Entrepreneurship and the Firm: Austrian Perspectives on Economic Organization (Elgar, 2002).
Nicolai J. Foss and Volker Mahnke, eds., Competence, Governance, and Entrepreneurship: Advances in Economic Strategy Research (Oxford, 2000).
Nicolai J. Foss and Paul L. Robertson, eds., Resources, Technology, and Strategy: Explorations in the Resource-based Perspective (Routledge, 2000).

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 261 other followers