Pros and Cons of Academic Blogging
3 December 2007 at 12:14 am Peter G. Klein 3 comments
| Peter Klein |
Scott Eric Kaufman, a PhD candidate in English literature who blogs at Acephalous, says academic blogging connects scholarship to the wider world:
There’s no reason our community needs to consist solely of people we knew in grad school. Why not write for people who don’t already how you think about everything? Why not force yourself to articulate your points in such a way that strangers could come to know your thought as intimately as your friends from grad school do?
The informal publishing mechanisms available online can facilitate such communication so long as bloggers write for an audience informally. Senior faculty might continue to orient their scholarly production to the four people whose scholarly journals don’t pile up in the corner of the living room, slowly buried beneath unpaid bills and unread New Yorkers. Whether they know it or not, bloggers write for an audience larger than the search committees we hope to impress. They have already started eye-balling the rest of the world, asking themselves how they can communicate with it without seeming to pander to it.
But the signal-to-noise ratio is very low, counters Adam Kotsko, a PhD student in theology:
[H]aving a productive conversation in an online format is very hard work, which is why it happens so rarely. Many bloggers can point out online conversations in which they were pushed to think in a new direction or got genuinely valuable feedback on a question, but as with all human endeavors, there is a high percentage of dross to go along with the occasional gold. Policing comments is a difficult job, and efforts to keep conversations on-topic or ensure that contributors have some substantial knowledge to share will often cause resentment in light of the “democratic” leanings of online communities. All this is on top of the obvious problems with online interaction as opposed to in-person conversations.
As more and more academic resources become available online, hopefully academic blogs will begin to fill a role analogous to the political blogs that link to and comment on particular news stories — that is, bringing new scholarly research to the attention of an interdisciplinary audience. I hope that events like this will help to push more journals toward open-access electronic formats. Failing that, however, academic blogs seem to me to be best-suited as a social outlet for academics who would otherwise feel isolated, creating camaraderie and supplementing the social aspects of disciplinary conferences.
Links via Candace de Russy.
Entry filed under: - Klein -, Education, Institutions.
3 Comments Add your own
Leave a comment
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed









1.
Rafe Champion | 4 December 2007 at 5:09 pm
Has anyone talked about the use of blogs by ambitious scholars to plant the germs of ideas before they are ready for academic publication in order to claim priority if they happen to work out? There is a bit of literature on the way people have done this in the past, can’t remember details but it might have included writing personal corresondence in Greek and Latin and burying things in footnotes. The idea was to get the idea out without enabling rivals to pick up on it too soon.
2.
Steve Phelan | 5 December 2007 at 3:17 am
Scribiam panton in lingua Romanum iam
3.
Rafe Champion | 5 December 2007 at 3:37 pm
That’s Greek to me!