There Isn’t Much Spam In It

1 May 2009 at 11:10 am 3 comments

| Dick Langlois |

A new working paper from the Association of Wine Economists is called “Can People Distinguish Pâté from Dog Food?” Here’s the abstract.

Considering the similarity of its ingredients, canned dog food could be a suitable and inexpensive substitute for pâté or processed blended meat products such as Spam or liverwurst. However, the social stigma associated with the human consumption of pet food makes an unbiased comparison challenging. To prevent bias, Newman’s Own dog food was prepared with a food processor to have the texture and appearance of a liver mousse. In a double-blind test, subjects were presented with five unlabeled blended meat products, one of which was the prepared dog food. After ranking the samples on the basis of taste, subjects were challenged to identify which of the five was dog food. Although 72% of subjects ranked the dog food as the worst of the five samples in terms of taste (Newell and MacFarlane multiple comparison, P<0.05), subjects were not better than random at correctly identifying the dog food.

Perhaps the group should broaden its name to the Association of Wine and Hors d’Oeuvre Economists.

Entry filed under: - Langlois -, Food and Agriculture.

The Ethics of Bankruptcy Cheer Up With the Depression Bundle

3 Comments Add your own

  • 1. david's avatar david  |  1 May 2009 at 1:05 pm

    As a lad, I recall watching Chris Elliott do the blind dog food taste test on the Letterman show. Of course, that didn’t involve pate. As far as we know, at least.

  • 2. David G. Hoopes's avatar David G. Hoopes  |  2 May 2009 at 12:30 am

    Were these people who had eaten Pate’ before? You could also through some liverwurst into the mix just for fun. I’ve tasted plenty of pate’ that could easily have ended up on some white bread with mayonnaise and iceberg lettuce (like me old German mom used to give me).

  • 3. Andre Sammartino's avatar Andre Sammartino  |  3 May 2009 at 8:40 pm

    I’m impressed anyone was able to get that through a university Huaman Ethics committee (if they did). Not sure “so we’re going to feed the participants dog food unwares” would hold much mustard at our school…

Leave a comment

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Authors

Nicolai J. Foss | home | posts
Peter G. Klein | home | posts
Richard Langlois | home | posts
Lasse B. Lien | home | posts

Guests

Former Guests | posts

Networking

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Categories

Feeds

Our Recent Books

Nicolai J. Foss and Peter G. Klein, Organizing Entrepreneurial Judgment: A New Approach to the Firm (Cambridge University Press, 2012).
Peter G. Klein and Micheal E. Sykuta, eds., The Elgar Companion to Transaction Cost Economics (Edward Elgar, 2010).
Peter G. Klein, The Capitalist and the Entrepreneur: Essays on Organizations and Markets (Mises Institute, 2010).
Richard N. Langlois, The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism: Schumpeter, Chandler, and the New Economy (Routledge, 2007).
Nicolai J. Foss, Strategy, Economic Organization, and the Knowledge Economy: The Coordination of Firms and Resources (Oxford University Press, 2005).
Raghu Garud, Arun Kumaraswamy, and Richard N. Langlois, eds., Managing in the Modular Age: Architectures, Networks and Organizations (Blackwell, 2003).
Nicolai J. Foss and Peter G. Klein, eds., Entrepreneurship and the Firm: Austrian Perspectives on Economic Organization (Elgar, 2002).
Nicolai J. Foss and Volker Mahnke, eds., Competence, Governance, and Entrepreneurship: Advances in Economic Strategy Research (Oxford, 2000).
Nicolai J. Foss and Paul L. Robertson, eds., Resources, Technology, and Strategy: Explorations in the Resource-based Perspective (Routledge, 2000).