The Soviets Really Did Have a Doomsday Machine
25 September 2009 at 12:08 am Peter G. Klein 4 comments
| Peter Klein |
According to the new issue of Wired (via the Economist), the Soviets really did have a doomsday machine and, as in Dr. Strangelove, didn’t tell anyone about it. Interestingly, the interpretation is that the Soviets, like Schelling’s rational addict, were directing the credible commitment not toward their opponents, but toward themselves:
The silence can be attributed partly to fears that the US would figure out how to disable the system. But the principal reason is more complicated and surprising. According to both Yarynich and Zheleznyakov, Perimeter was never meant as a traditional doomsday machine. The Soviets had taken game theory one step further than Kubrick, Szilard, and everyone else: They built a system to deter themselves.
By guaranteeing that Moscow could hit back, Perimeter was actually designed to keep an overeager Soviet military or civilian leader from launching prematurely during a crisis. The point, Zheleznyakov says, was “to cool down all these hotheads and extremists. No matter what was going to happen, there still would be revenge. Those who attack us will be punished.”
This wouldn’t deter a Jack D. Ripper type, I suppose. Still, fascinating discussion for those who teach about strategic commitment.
Entry filed under: - Klein -, Strategic Management, Teaching.
4 Comments Add your own
Leave a comment
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed









1.
A máquina do juízo final « De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum | 25 September 2009 at 10:58 am
[…] o governo da antiga URSS parece ser um bom exemplo para os livros de Teoria dos Jogos. Confira mais aqui. […]
2. Menace crédible, guerre froide et auto-contrôle « Rationalité Limitée | 26 September 2009 at 10:32 am
[…] machine“, une arme de destruction massive susceptible de détruire toute vie sur terre (via). Nommée “Périmètre”, cette arme était programmée pour lancer […]
3.
srp | 27 September 2009 at 4:37 am
“Our premier so loves his surprises.”
4.
Strategic benefits of limiting your options « NYU Stern Economics | 31 January 2013 at 7:41 pm
[…] Luis notes that there really was a doomsday machine. The reason they kept it secret involves more game […]