O&M Blocked

18 September 2006 at 5:37 am 5 comments

| Nicolai Foss |

I have just been informed by an avid O&M reader of Chinese nationality that upon his return to China a few days ago he found that O&M has been blocked by the Chinese authorities.  Marginal Revolution, on the other hand, has not been blocked. Peter and I have long been wondering about the differences in the size of the readership of O&M and MR. We now have the explanation.

Entry filed under: - Foss -, Ephemera.

Reciprocal Harm Is Selective Intervention Really “Impossible”?

5 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Jung-Chin Shen  |  18 September 2006 at 9:28 am

    Is it simply due to the size of the readership? I know many, if not most, Taiwanese websites are blocked by Chinese government, but it is difficult for me to find a consistent standard behind the censorship. Some largely pro-China websites in Taiwan, though few, are also blocked by the authorities. Perhaps the authority consists of a group of bounded rational workers facing coordination problems and conflicting orders and objectives. ;-)

  • 2. Nicolai Foss  |  18 September 2006 at 9:37 am

    Jung-Chin, What I meant is: We have relatively few readers (approx. 500 on a daily basis), because those darn commies block us! ;-)

  • 3. Anon  |  18 September 2006 at 12:36 pm

    can this work?

    Access Blogspot Banned

  • 4. Anon  |  18 September 2006 at 12:38 pm

    If so, there should be a wordpress one at least…

  • 5. Peter Klein  |  18 September 2006 at 9:49 pm

    Much as I’d like to believe that we’re blocked because the Chinese authorities view us (and not Marginal Revolution) as a grave threat, apparently the problem is that the entire wordpress.com domain is blocked. If we weren’t so lazy (sorry: I mean, if our opportunity costs weren’t so high) we’d take the time to install the blogging software on our own site, rather than let wordpress host it for us. (As a friend of mine put it: “Your domain is such-and-such-dot-wordpress-com? That’s _so_ 2003!”)

    I understand that Chinese readers can get around this by using a proxy server or anonymizer.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Authors

Nicolai J. Foss | home | posts
Peter G. Klein | home | posts
Richard Langlois | home | posts
Lasse B. Lien | home | posts

Guests

Former Guests | posts

Networking

Recent Posts

Categories

Feeds

Our Recent Books

Nicolai J. Foss and Peter G. Klein, Organizing Entrepreneurial Judgment: A New Approach to the Firm (Cambridge University Press, 2012).
Peter G. Klein and Micheal E. Sykuta, eds., The Elgar Companion to Transaction Cost Economics (Edward Elgar, 2010).
Peter G. Klein, The Capitalist and the Entrepreneur: Essays on Organizations and Markets (Mises Institute, 2010).
Richard N. Langlois, The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism: Schumpeter, Chandler, and the New Economy (Routledge, 2007).
Nicolai J. Foss, Strategy, Economic Organization, and the Knowledge Economy: The Coordination of Firms and Resources (Oxford University Press, 2005).
Raghu Garud, Arun Kumaraswamy, and Richard N. Langlois, eds., Managing in the Modular Age: Architectures, Networks and Organizations (Blackwell, 2003).
Nicolai J. Foss and Peter G. Klein, eds., Entrepreneurship and the Firm: Austrian Perspectives on Economic Organization (Elgar, 2002).
Nicolai J. Foss and Volker Mahnke, eds., Competence, Governance, and Entrepreneurship: Advances in Economic Strategy Research (Oxford, 2000).
Nicolai J. Foss and Paul L. Robertson, eds., Resources, Technology, and Strategy: Explorations in the Resource-based Perspective (Routledge, 2000).