Pomo Periscope VI: Performativity

14 November 2006 at 12:29 pm Leave a comment

| Nicolai Foss |

Teppo Felin at orgtheory.net has an excellent post today on Donald MacKenzie’s An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Markets — a book that has received praise from Michel Callon, Karin Knorr-Certina — and Paul Samuelson! 

As the title of the book indicates, the book puts our old friend here at O&M — reflexivity (cf. this post) — to work in the context of the interplay between financial markets and financial economics. It sounds as if this will be a great read for the Ferraro-Pfeffer-Suttons of this World. (I haven’t read the book yet myself, so I cannot judge the accuracy of what Teppo says about it). 

Here is what seems to be the core in Teppo’s critique of the central premise of performativity in the MacKenzie book:

The problem of performativity essentially is that the argument suggests that theory pre-exists or creates, rather than describes or explains, reality, at least in its strong version (e.g., Latour and Woolgar, in Laboratory Life, argue that microbes do not really exist, only as they were “created” and realized through scientist interaction – Kuhnian extremism).  The effort in the strong program of social construction is to take knowledge out of the domain of the universal and real and bring it into the domain of the contingent and social (Martin Hollis edited a great book on the matter – Rationality and Relativism – with contributions by Bloor and Barnes – early developers of the “strong program” to which MacKenzie contributes).

If we take the definition that “performativity is the idea that theories and models bring about the very conditions that they attempt to explain,” then, the immediate question is – why?  It seems that theories take effect where there are justified reasons for believing that they are true.  Thus, not just anything can be asserted (and thus created) as reality, which seems to be the case based on performativity.  In short, performativity lacks meaningful boundaries for what can be asserted and why it is taken to be true and real, rather it simply in post hoc fashion labels whatever happens to emerge in reality as: performativity. 

Now, can theories be wrong and nonetheless be acted upon (and thus become real)?  Of course they can.  But, this however in no way provides evidence for performativity, even though MacKenzie hopes to make these links.  Theories over time get “checked” by reality, and continually adjusted over time, with increasingly better explanations of given phenomenon.  Now, does the fact that theories affect reality provide evidence for performativity?  No.  Of course true theories can affect reality (the natural sciences provide plenty of robust examples), but, theories only affect reality within the limits of their actual explanation, impact and improvement (without quotations marks) on that reality – a distinction that performativity does not seem to make.  That is, the truth of theories and associated progress is not mere rhetoric, but rather, real.

As a final comment – performativity is also extremely ad hoc in that when predictions of theories and models are not found to be true (the thesis of performativity is that theories, whether false or true, create reality), they are simply labeled counterperformativity.  That is ad hoc, and suspiciously convenient for retrospective story-telling.

Entry filed under: - Foss -, Methods/Methodology/Theory of Science, Pomo Periscope, Recommended Reading.

Italian Academia Goes International Chaired Position in Entrepreneurship

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Nicolai J. Foss | home | posts
Peter G. Klein | home | posts
Richard Langlois | home | posts
Lasse B. Lien | home | posts


Former Guests | posts


Recent Posts



Our Recent Books

Nicolai J. Foss and Peter G. Klein, Organizing Entrepreneurial Judgment: A New Approach to the Firm (Cambridge University Press, 2012).
Peter G. Klein and Micheal E. Sykuta, eds., The Elgar Companion to Transaction Cost Economics (Edward Elgar, 2010).
Peter G. Klein, The Capitalist and the Entrepreneur: Essays on Organizations and Markets (Mises Institute, 2010).
Richard N. Langlois, The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism: Schumpeter, Chandler, and the New Economy (Routledge, 2007).
Nicolai J. Foss, Strategy, Economic Organization, and the Knowledge Economy: The Coordination of Firms and Resources (Oxford University Press, 2005).
Raghu Garud, Arun Kumaraswamy, and Richard N. Langlois, eds., Managing in the Modular Age: Architectures, Networks and Organizations (Blackwell, 2003).
Nicolai J. Foss and Peter G. Klein, eds., Entrepreneurship and the Firm: Austrian Perspectives on Economic Organization (Elgar, 2002).
Nicolai J. Foss and Volker Mahnke, eds., Competence, Governance, and Entrepreneurship: Advances in Economic Strategy Research (Oxford, 2000).
Nicolai J. Foss and Paul L. Robertson, eds., Resources, Technology, and Strategy: Explorations in the Resource-based Perspective (Routledge, 2000).

%d bloggers like this: