Mechanistic Analogies in Economics

29 November 2006 at 10:59 am Leave a comment

| Peter Klein |

Paul Ormerod, in “The Fading of Friedman” (American Prospect, December 2006), compares the macroeconomic views of Friedman, Keynes, and Hayek and prefers the latter:

Both [Friedman and Keynes] believed that suitably empowered clever chaps could work out rules of behaviour that would smooth the fluctuations of the business cycle. Friedman came up with the rule of an independent central bank controlling the expansion of money at a fixed rate. Keynes essentially thought that if he and other old Etonians were put in charge, everything would be fine. . . . But Hayek sharply disagreed. He believed that there are inherent limits to knowledge in human social and economic systems which no amount of intellect can overcome.

Developments in economics are taking the subject in the direction of Hayek rather than Friedman and Keynes.

These remarks came to mind when I read Monday’s EH.Net review of Harro Maas, William Stanley Jevons and the Making of Modern Economics (Cambridge University Press, 2005). Jevons, in this regard, was the anti-Hayek.

Reviewer Michael V. White begins by noting Jevons’s great admiration for Charles Babbage and Babbage’s designs for a “calculating machine.” Maas’s book, writes White,

argues that Jevons’ “theoretical” and “statistical” publications in political economy, often treated as analytically quite separate, were actually closely linked. They were underpinned by a mechanical representation of the human mind that was symbolized by Jevons’ own logical machine. . . .

[Jevons] followed and contributed to a British “style of reasoning” which, by the mid-nineteenth century, had blurred the distinction between mind and matter to represent the mind and behavior in mechanical terms. This dissolved the distinction between the “moral” and the “natural” sciences so that the methods of the latter could be used to rework political economy.

The mechanistic analogy, of course, was absent from Carl Menger’s formulation of marginal utility theory, also published in 1871, the year of Jevons’s Theory of Political Economy.

For more on mechanistic analogies see my review of Philip Mirowski’s 1988 book Against Mechanism: Protecting Economics from Science.

Entry filed under: - Klein -, Methods/Methodology/Theory of Science.

Patently Absurd: Ham Sandwich Edition Even Danes Respond to Incentives

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Nicolai J. Foss | home | posts
Peter G. Klein | home | posts
Richard Langlois | home | posts
Lasse B. Lien | home | posts


Former Guests | posts


Recent Posts



Our Recent Books

Nicolai J. Foss and Peter G. Klein, Organizing Entrepreneurial Judgment: A New Approach to the Firm (Cambridge University Press, 2012).
Peter G. Klein and Micheal E. Sykuta, eds., The Elgar Companion to Transaction Cost Economics (Edward Elgar, 2010).
Peter G. Klein, The Capitalist and the Entrepreneur: Essays on Organizations and Markets (Mises Institute, 2010).
Richard N. Langlois, The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism: Schumpeter, Chandler, and the New Economy (Routledge, 2007).
Nicolai J. Foss, Strategy, Economic Organization, and the Knowledge Economy: The Coordination of Firms and Resources (Oxford University Press, 2005).
Raghu Garud, Arun Kumaraswamy, and Richard N. Langlois, eds., Managing in the Modular Age: Architectures, Networks and Organizations (Blackwell, 2003).
Nicolai J. Foss and Peter G. Klein, eds., Entrepreneurship and the Firm: Austrian Perspectives on Economic Organization (Elgar, 2002).
Nicolai J. Foss and Volker Mahnke, eds., Competence, Governance, and Entrepreneurship: Advances in Economic Strategy Research (Oxford, 2000).
Nicolai J. Foss and Paul L. Robertson, eds., Resources, Technology, and Strategy: Explorations in the Resource-based Perspective (Routledge, 2000).

%d bloggers like this: