Nurkse at 100

5 June 2007 at 1:31 pm 2 comments

| Peter Klein |

Reader G. V. Varma reminds me that Ragnar Nurkse was born 100 years ago today, June 5. I don’t have anything to add to this earlier post except to share these funky diagrams from Nurkse’s 1935 Review of Economic Studies article on the structure of production. Each is supposed to illustrate a circular process in which fixed capital reproduces itself. (Neither, I’m afraid, will win an award for pedagogy.)

The spout-and-ring diagram is explained as follows: “The ‘ring’ is equivalent in meaning to Dept. I [which produces capital goods] and the ‘spout’ to Dept. II pouring forth its output of consumable goods. The output of Dept. I divides itself as the dotted line: part of it flows back into the ring (to maintain fixed capital in Dept. I itself). This picture, though less informative than the departmental scheme [pictured below] in bringing out the internal exchange relationships of a capitalist economy, may nevertheless be useful in illustrating the circular process of capital reproduction as lying, in a sense, behind the purposive orientation economic activity directed toward the creation of consumable income.”

Hopefully there is a Nurkse specialist out there who can help us make sense of the larger diagram.

nurkse1.jpg

Entry filed under: - Klein -, Ephemera.

Did Nobody Consider the Incentive Effects? Do We Need a Project Project?

2 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Nicolai Foss  |  6 June 2007 at 1:14 am

    Aren’t the “larger diagram” “simply” two Hayekian triangles, illustrating two sectors that provide inputs to each other? So, Dept I produces, say, tractors under the application of land and labor to Dept II which produces bread which is used to feed the labor in Dept I.

  • 2. Peter Klein  |  6 June 2007 at 9:48 am

    Yes, I think so, though there are many peculiarities. I think is point is not that workers build tractors and tractors make bread which feeds workers, but that the bread goes to workers in both sectors, and the tractors are not only an input into the production of bread, but also a replacement for existing tractors that wear out, making the entire process self-contained and “automatic.” Oddly, though, for an analysis that begins with a Hayekian stages-of-production diagram, there doesn’t seem to be much capital heterogeneity. For example, some of the output of Dept I is said to replace worn-out capital goods used in Dept I. But to make tractors you need not other tractors, but machines and tools that are of a still “higher” order (to use the Mengerian language). Maybe the diagram makes sense only with a single homogeneous capital good and a single consumption good.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Authors

Nicolai J. Foss | home | posts
Peter G. Klein | home | posts
Richard Langlois | home | posts
Lasse B. Lien | home | posts

Guests

Former Guests | posts

Networking

Recent Posts

Categories

Feeds

Our Recent Books

Nicolai J. Foss and Peter G. Klein, Organizing Entrepreneurial Judgment: A New Approach to the Firm (Cambridge University Press, 2012).
Peter G. Klein and Micheal E. Sykuta, eds., The Elgar Companion to Transaction Cost Economics (Edward Elgar, 2010).
Peter G. Klein, The Capitalist and the Entrepreneur: Essays on Organizations and Markets (Mises Institute, 2010).
Richard N. Langlois, The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism: Schumpeter, Chandler, and the New Economy (Routledge, 2007).
Nicolai J. Foss, Strategy, Economic Organization, and the Knowledge Economy: The Coordination of Firms and Resources (Oxford University Press, 2005).
Raghu Garud, Arun Kumaraswamy, and Richard N. Langlois, eds., Managing in the Modular Age: Architectures, Networks and Organizations (Blackwell, 2003).
Nicolai J. Foss and Peter G. Klein, eds., Entrepreneurship and the Firm: Austrian Perspectives on Economic Organization (Elgar, 2002).
Nicolai J. Foss and Volker Mahnke, eds., Competence, Governance, and Entrepreneurship: Advances in Economic Strategy Research (Oxford, 2000).
Nicolai J. Foss and Paul L. Robertson, eds., Resources, Technology, and Strategy: Explorations in the Resource-based Perspective (Routledge, 2000).